IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-quic-recovery-33: (with COMMENT)

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Wed, 06 January 2021 04:18 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336B03A0C58; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:18:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.846
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.846 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uxdw3Z-Kg_IE; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:18:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE23F3A0D08; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id q22so3462636eja.2; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 20:18:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1LzmjH1i7aXwftF+f9iUfhWcwA825hxnQDfAi8sv+Kc=; b=pxjDa91QVvP6IEmbs4m/K2UY+eefze7RyL68L1w253U60Ema35diUE7D7QA9nG5UyE r3LaQq605P26eqjmlDl2jEA6gowTQeRbFL8DjgkLo/ABVFKSSdVJpc9cK/Iw9L/z+XSG WHWrXAoMyN+NiZ/GRlrq0OZizr6qWJ9G85BBSuv8j4PVoeb2/WEOyIXrZk2H3Vkjhq/C jEAKFbFKptZtcAWEFjmoiha0/lXBZ+KnDNzePPvJa0HAbFB8kBiYNgp/HivfiXBtX0Vm S32a3cBUlSHx5w+aZIq6a3ctTNORHmEVaVtUSVFJcbKWc7T6bADSZ7XKQ4sU8lKXNH5V zluw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1LzmjH1i7aXwftF+f9iUfhWcwA825hxnQDfAi8sv+Kc=; b=gOOSJJacdjRocjvu6FLy0Luxzg+SYHRm/SV/7GD7StCi3kJpCqD1q+HNZXpPLnK2yQ W/Oy3kV81L9YYERDYz0+TXxDPfMXMJkDWZm0mumyerusOlIgjEj3s0YB5Un5q46d0pNO O/BaMEdDcd1QNptjvNhu6VWUwhmR4S+3kNyk2WC7UqQElk4FTBBKt4hvrCOsUGpbxBmM 7/iOTEEwvGrzb1b885Y9m8BzALK/chG8DfgFzKxAjTQhABr9g7QXMWZv4YJdO+0ebMiM sxK0jAdlNmFMIUs9vMlVDYuhpmA53cD2rX8mE1JMQMAzpqxTZOzdcSE25rIsD997Tx5r hthA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fldNUq0M5w8cPBuZcbA++UrYtaaMGrJXp70DTWNv1fAaANu5r UztT+E5scp98XOY2918K63Qz0kl0T8ryPVS27Ao=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRr4IC5icm25NFL3e20I742HsA8xbFcjns6qo+mzrfwkKvPH+MjzfLUfDjYfF1r/e8RYUlRoJvk5o1+TYSZS8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7251:: with SMTP id ds17mr1151806ejc.448.1609906685282; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 20:18:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160988618004.22369.6406422308029142891@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160988618004.22369.6406422308029142891@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:17:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oYVvXgnGb-YTpf_zD2OEwgKrCextt+95himfeCR9985VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-quic-recovery-33: (with COMMENT)
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-quic-recovery@ietf.org, WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000190d9705b8339ca5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/NkeI9Mnns62arxkEv60-xfah-ww>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:18:09 -0000

Hi Roman,

Thanks for the review. I've captured your comments as issues on the QUIC WG
GItHub repository. Links to each are provided as in-line responses.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:36 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-quic-recovery-33: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-recovery/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks to Derrell Piper for the SECDIR review.
>
> ** Section 3.  Per “The encryption level indicates the packet number
> space, as
> described in [QUIC-TRANSPORT ]”, I think that reference here is Section 4.*
> from [QUIC-TLS] as I can’t find a mapping between PNS and encryption
> levels as
> discussed here in [QUIC-TRANSPORT].
>

https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4555

Cheers,
Lucas
On behalf of QUIC WG Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email