Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 22:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF361126DFB
for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 2tcSg6m2NOWm for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EA07126E64
for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y137so1512316qka.4
for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=smpd2401DzPQshGpfp99zvmX5ZrwP/XeKL82qBFy1ZU=;
b=vLGVzMDbR1k4FZYvTIMldhRqftdQqCE/eymOtWV5f4xQ3GzfnKfqVu99whVbINFRvX
QdNMElOg7DoROYy5iVODUv6kUTBojZdiPVazeLHDcTZ582uDIO9FxxWh/8lONW0aImGx
v20VbP9tpN8oMW3Vomb+yqV0dn3XQS1O6GR/q/hdVDgLHyFRPSOpSW3QOiIqDk/MX5bj
V3IOzQpxsPCIHF2NPsMJRbr+fKSSlaNfYH6VQCWchFRLdIxS9I42GnKIU/7xfpNoqVNo
9fomAwo0o/eDZeOq5NmpflFUMVSaOWzMi1w1eP0ESUdlpNrg3RkynxCQyEc2gGquB/6d
PBGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=smpd2401DzPQshGpfp99zvmX5ZrwP/XeKL82qBFy1ZU=;
b=q7lFU/6nZrnSGUGrPvV2sAS4Wy4l+IVPmoS/tSjY0YrwY4Y1j1etcGBr/FCLLFAVmU
ybBwWOtO7ywdqhqLynH6y7lTOCjEq2e4t2Qhqo7AQSfW5n4TJ0TAWYw2fBXcSOid4WcH
Djw00LsYGxovXIACiLFoR5Y7pDfA+552PCRjAMJsqoHYASaYfGNmpW5KCH5H8fDd7nPQ
4EA6elp3WGr8EdAU1/yMDoPF0apk7les50qGSqkuw2tiM+4zc1cQ5ayItorWx466g4X/
lMepb4MP7JfsjfDTUH4WMQTwKkl99w81dtAQjxtNfwoPkC6ADi1YVMBS65IX55k+q6Mh
yC7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HFQrl+EaCQsz3FTJweqVpMWjEdtsdgkfOXe2uDUHy6BRjt3Nuv
l495/ccvKl/xVIc/4vUKZmRyT2G3bLcburApQR308A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtcfa6VZk2VVbgcEt+7Mqh04GMwZGCTfJFRy2FDI/ATrFVDEaZUgQNGnpbcd+eLMGOgWEmBwAN7NKVUzCidDM8=
X-Received: by 10.55.22.28 with SMTP id g28mr3654793qkh.152.1520981489284;
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.37.176 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBtWodBt7HR9SZmb4KhuOaaTLJ+CnwjhGO3Td5dL6xxmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBO9g5vnPK2aGYEUOYOkT-898Gc0-d4T=kDvxuE2Yg6kMQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABcZeBNAYiTzdyE+UcqvThgnKhDthuq2-UyjEBoJkpep8-t5vg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+9kkMBtWodBt7HR9SZmb4KhuOaaTLJ+CnwjhGO3Td5dL6xxmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:50:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOgqcL=GiFAAoKMidQa8=whpdDk5jk9zHgSRMz1g5tUag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11474630610fbd05675319be"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/OovhPf5uQqPrNQjgOdxC0MZaEK0>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>,
<mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>,
<mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:51:33 -0000
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > >> >> I'd like to focus on the architectural question for the moment. I >> think there's broad -- though not universal -- agreement that the >> stream 0 thing is not great, but a fair amount of debate about >> what the right architecture and architectural principles are. >> It's not really productive to talk about schedule impact until >> we understand what the right thing is. >> >> > Hi Eric, > > As it stands, you've identified a pain point, and you've made a proposal > to rebase a key part of the architecture on the basis of that pain. > > Folks agree with you that it is a pain point, but all of the feedback > you're getting that this isn't worth the schedule slip is, fundamentally, > also feedback on how bad the pain is. The message I read (and, to be fair, > participated in sending) from this thread is "not bad enough for this". > It's clearly bad enough that Christian, I, and I'm sure others would like > you to create a PR to incorporate what improvements from your proposal can > fit into the current structure. If that's the conversation you want to > have, I'm happy to jump in. > Hi Ted, I appreciate your concern with the schedule, and I do recognize that there are people who think that this is too late to discuss, but I also heard people who thought it was worth exploring, which is what I'm asking for at the moment. Even if I were to concede that that were not the case -- which I don't -- it's not possible to have a discussion about what we can do to address these issues without understanding the architectural principles we are trying to follow, which requires actually discussing the points I raised above. -Ekr > But I don't think we can ignore the signal that the current state of > affairs actually works and that changing away from it so completely isn't > worth the (new) pain. I think we will lose both momentum and expertise if > we start over to this extent at this juncture, and I'd rather we did not. > I'm particularly worried that the uncertainty around this could kill the > productivity of the hackathon and London meeting, and that we won't recover > until the next interim, if then. > > Not talking about that as we analyze this seems to me to be the wrong > choice. > > regards, > > Ted > /no hats > > >
- Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eric Rescorla
- RE: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Lucas Pardue
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Ted Hardie
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Salz, Rich
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eric Rescorla
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eric Rescorla
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Mark Nottingham
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eric Rescorla
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Ian Swett
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Kazuho Oku
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Subodh Iyengar
- RE: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Kazuho Oku
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Marten Seemann
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Mirja Kühlewind
- RE: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Lubashev, Igor
- RE: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Lucas Pardue
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Patrick McManus
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eric Rescorla
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Christian Huitema
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eggert, Lars
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Roberto Peon
- RE: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Mike Bishop
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eric Rescorla
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Christian Huitema
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Victor Vasiliev
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Subodh Iyengar
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Ted Hardie
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Martin Duke
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Brian Trammell (IETF)
- RE: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Christopher Wood
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Leif Hedstrom
- RE: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Gabriel Montenegro
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Christian Huitema
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eric Rescorla
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Ted Hardie
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eric Rescorla
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Ted Hardie
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Philipp S. Tiesel
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Mark Nottingham
- Re: Proposal: Run QUIC over DTLS Eric Rescorla