IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: More on demultiplexing

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 06 December 2017 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC711275FD for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:25:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kPbaoSDjs1GH for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22b.google.com (mail-yb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED6DF12426E for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id p128so2007645yba.7 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:25:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YbzHw1dpJCGcbAVQ6PQDEHav4BGMrbqIbEmVKgLBwk8=; b=T+1LqpTGlka1q7dxC2sYxlWgHYctT5ADZ9ZcwVtHe55E9PlUnoUmz8KbzKps1+mhb3 7wrpB9LYHhqlAaZTMgr84NiL7OyCyGcTTid9Uix930YhnzvjOmV9fDgoyrDoM3rCAQ+b Lqkb0kvHnci4mRaRm4Vi7L3xwkQ9tySIb88d2jUTryI2iM73N+gocm7773JqRmH7KXGf 0gzRwxJdYkLq1oTBzNscuBaKOZZ5ZixelDxvkOubxZqIzICBgfDNTS06YLCJINsRftxI 7vQlXPpAh2Y9RWkRV/1ALEvrqUGFeZeyKPXHOshk2jk+UFFADUscm9tE9IIWXr4H3Ddt HLNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YbzHw1dpJCGcbAVQ6PQDEHav4BGMrbqIbEmVKgLBwk8=; b=pmdU1kV8xMM0+HHeW79tqlbWH/dS4Tkr++3NkPhfTMehWqDIIvxfEofcPlsdiMX6MJ F3qeNceCPE2Yp5a0ebGfA+jBF6Oerp/vqEN/cG5XzLMAFpOb6m+o6ETXkj7n+M3EI3Ed P7yndMTJ+ifTQfgR9TjpDENjVweucJCSC5246LAQ7QGdZRiW6NhCZGhLAaVYH4EMohZ3 GWlEKda04EuhXdfOyPvnEc7TOUUdEnyUmliLDGpJlhS84FR7VJaAoMRWdLGje6/gISrv shkfJgCUthM9nakHul/hHpZqgk8SdHzEh4rXpu+0Gfn7SNze8M7/ai2un0Wnowv5V9H3 Q3LQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5ZA7kVvT7GCOk2rx4WpalT8QEfwtqAXJ0DDdoYEPG6ym0Ycgy8 mf/cB893MrOuU0Jg4tQd+HAC1AvRQSj3BUL/hkcIUQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbx/AzcwGEN3eE6Se4eMe/xwPICb/37tTjGWVfQkUM31uQoLvtIC4xDLkBjdSf5F1kl4R2rHh96M29ZEwgwc/E=
X-Received: by 10.37.107.82 with SMTP id o18mr15694087ybm.293.1512588332131; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:25:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.123.132 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:24:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAN1APdeUpVf5HTg549O5nn4dhPre1hm=WShUi+_ZKGx8aG-Zbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBO=WCTLuuxaOJXKzQdiBduOxLdoqNtMpvPatBOAwNjZkQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN1APdeUpVf5HTg549O5nn4dhPre1hm=WShUi+_ZKGx8aG-Zbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:24:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPjmQK5Cw5Ctt51cnxHGnV=REraOAfm4eRbWN0jiD5GWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: More on demultiplexing
To: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e08267d303a80ec055fb0ead1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/PK_7cImzRNquWttekOygdODLQCc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 19:25:34 -0000

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com
> wrote:

> On 6 December 2017 at 19.42.37, Eric Rescorla (ekr@rtfm.com) wrote:
>
> I've been doing some thinking about the QUIC muxing story. It seems
> like the case that everyone has in their head is WebRTC, so I'd like
> to focus on that.
>
> Well, the concern is probably that QUIC might not have a routable UDP port
> otherwise, and WebRTC is likely available.
>
I don't understand what you are saying here. WebRTC does not have a defined
port.

-Ekr



> Another case could be port 53 for QUIC/DNS.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email