IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-quic-invariants-12: (with COMMENT)

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Mon, 04 January 2021 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5CA3A0C62; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:12:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.053
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ag-RZDRhtLI4; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 031313A0AEE; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:12:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id t16so9395968ejf.13; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:12:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DRCB3tIDh3Y4KgHQJfcWqUDq/ZkhWb95MHbC8D5efvs=; b=E3ipQvHKCMX0UzNmpAo5HR+tURdeaKQAvyg6jHUcu3SjTnxbUGfktAy/smpekjBF51 sMZqNzKSreRrzlx4unMt/BcjmyKiBv/Y5Q/FFYMHlYVQ0wrljD68J4TVietF25LmdaeS NLhMzMk9ybJitdd23nmjMPfgFRuVo2VpKyAV0f6p0RXiMkswuRC3R8PjyhNNCkN/5M8h XqaisruUZyZK/YI61P1uB4zYlp7rwnofiBmk+3+uP0lRwxMMdOadjI9ONMa3+8N8AQKK qL97YAcEUJfE6ODUVpoDkpLomUKptY78fG9b/fuCo/NgNRzG3mkpZW+t/WOYmX7EoqjT uwVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DRCB3tIDh3Y4KgHQJfcWqUDq/ZkhWb95MHbC8D5efvs=; b=dZ+1u+wSJKSW3n4S3B6Y+9sLwFDE49oyhI8K5d0Ol6hwXricClaHSeLF01yPi9yGSx ftSVdMvKG7gRa2nqRI8EQcr5cptRkwPchgLrw8QVCWLCt6SqeBMEMH28K+Ge61oAkYvj 4DohyIKtnpZIneEgp0EtvmMCVL/qqupmAYOVUcFCw6pNSvT5kdgjXX/Dg5TZ+/BTEwvX HgFlReFXKhIIreAqUqoDhNb38g+b2JvpYXaZ5zPdnnzHY1M+JqbHeVVKfXf4dkskQEA9 cYb+lW8+MOVTY1W5fVLNUB6mtPNRPCPKSoJDoSV/LIsq69QHzf+naRCkhANgqRXaXVp0 i7FA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HYVwGpVDsY5df9VTIZR5yJGRKwnoWuLkKdoE+qSDkrTVbakU9 RDvHyAE/9Jy6t6rvHBNqD8zYAgUcvnK4jYHJj24=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9ZJfUY/3AAkhZG9JtfUD0qr7SyXzskpJRlMusrUtR1qHbhDlwmL9ygkOp3ENX1ViZoq8UX09MNEIzWU6KRC8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:aec6:: with SMTP id me6mr19118781ejb.542.1609801923553; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:12:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160979777561.26454.2614031389765873245@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160979777561.26454.2614031389765873245@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 23:11:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9obAQm1zU2VE_zy4M7XD3h=PF3cZS8ZPrakex=P5wshR6w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-quic-invariants-12: (with COMMENT)
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-quic-invariants@ietf.org, WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cfeddb05b81b37b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/PaGNZNjXNNmTGd8AKTyZVmQ88kk>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 23:12:18 -0000

Hi Barry,

Thanks for the review. I've captured your comment on the QUIC WG GitHub
repository at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4469

Cheers
Lucas
On behalf of QUIC WG Chairs

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 10:02 PM Barry Leiba via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-quic-invariants-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-invariants/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Not at DISCUSS level, but I do question whether quic-transport should be a
> normative reference, as none of this really makes much sense without that.
>
>
>
>

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email