Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 19 May 2024 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CDBC14F685 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2024 00:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="V4Z4i0z5"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="GRpFOUDu"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EY34faTSpTjL for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2024 00:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E4BBC14F5E7 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 May 2024 00:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785F81140126 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 May 2024 03:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 May 2024 03:38:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1716104294; x=1716190694; bh=qfKbcJ0p1TPkCWzQJnUNYAa5kcbPKnulyoN 2EsGcpwQ=; b=V4Z4i0z5vEEF1qNQ4SO+TikJ3Nz5TURT80uYP74wIgiRQyG72Ix IGaKVFCI3txER983PUNJ2Dr/U98Iyau6MiEvRi9hnBHGxXxaHoJjgfFPPQeBIb82 iXW4/N3YUNkunW33InYWblYIZWT9H6O3Pj1b1xaWImnS/t3hqp7723i1cdPMZQcz P/7s8hb4TddYhZ6DmeHJyaJAfjkZPMq7gmMy96yhN5AKGwZ/Y70lRyfzvj2+UswR JX2TMGd5MN6pcaKCCHVT+qz+vIeku46SIINpjfvyIDVFInaP+CvOTNt3/nYUqnYT +vI4yzQCIcbErpqrJr1josYfkQ7LmVHDN+A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1716104294; x= 1716190694; bh=qfKbcJ0p1TPkCWzQJnUNYAa5kcbPKnulyoN2EsGcpwQ=; b=G RpFOUDu7oyN5SgLp5t8BAj6uFEC76W1PZd5JN5EP8EXWGUWkV3BlXKGJWlfLkR16 XxSAv4VN/vhscjVxJd5fpSWQrNPi8Q03+S8nTHjehq0GF3GCWD1GHIQvUgYl1gI7 ze2h7fFt19aR1rPwZxWbfxSNAzrqF01N8fyVsc7wrYtT8tm5viXqkemxg8pBOjEc XMQy95HwR1cEnSfFaKBdgTMwaqYsgqCFSYdMr/+kPvL5lXJfNZPkrSgjescdS1ZM m96ITM/FEc9lZoi2qrsDg361t0lNtErqe9pqse6aeDxYFQy7yVO7oQzggoI6RDkg kUJyDCJxBJHd1RBo1EEsg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ZqxJZqjaetOs17veYmW3GqziI27sLD1jmLzf3jTJYIm2BO9G4n6JRw> <xme:ZqxJZrAlmPavVKc1Up3qCfEXnS0R-J-eUaAotazn-m5E6ga0Z1uVoUW5ou3zLoLyH ityiwd73ocOMDsCNA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:ZqxJZiGERAbW9oq-KPWh5Sw3hkrEtdNQXEOegwmy7NX4s95_Y4FZl4Y4TmlFRvlYtYs7vtO7_wOqme5dEFP5OSHPl2iSI_8rpH3Be1RLuiWummrajVp_mGFSqs3BGc_g9oacIQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdehjedguddvtdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ZqxJZjRUMeujziPMOLUsvdCbWz02LsQGFFKOlTzolLtYg-wqBStM5Q> <xmx:ZqxJZnxW22nVwjg8qrwxcVm_gVxs8w_r5l_Yukar7X1nnJu6K68jRw> <xmx:ZqxJZh7XTeUVyf3rJXKRAwWHxySXEvHHf35jo0vtnlEJWPjN2VMANw> <xmx:ZqxJZkwdr1fkKdHNoP5Pr-9FgLAfY0U2GzuK6MCkQFBItjEnstHomg> <xmx:ZqxJZi83tCDIUaIT2h4NIjfaOEViwyxtRZ0OxxqhuGmhSMA8yafI-t6x>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 May 2024 03:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============2656426463185330401=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20240519073815.8E4BBC14F5E7@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 00:38:15 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: ISC2RIHN6HAL6RBNZ47VSBAWPRFCG2XR
X-Message-ID-Hash: ISC2RIHN6HAL6RBNZ47VSBAWPRFCG2XR
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-quic.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Pf2_EdEwjKB8psQ0lcYnUGzj5gA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:quic-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:quic-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:quic-leave@ietf.org>
Events without label "editorial" Issues ------ * quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-1/💬1) 1 issues created: - Is there is any implementation which I can use to check QUIC conn state like what I see for TCP (by NithishK2002) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/5007 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #5007 Is there is any implementation which I can use to check QUIC conn state like what I see for TCP netstat shows ESTABLISHED , TIME_WAIT and FIN_WAIT states (1 by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/5007 1 issues closed: - Is there is any implementation which I can use to check QUIC conn state like what I see for TCP netstat shows ESTABLISHED , TIME_WAIT and FIN_WAIT states https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/5007 * quicwg/qlog (+0/-0/💬1) 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #192 Rework $ProtocolEventBody (1 by LPardue) https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/192 [design] [high-level-schema] [discuss] * quicwg/multipath (+4/-2/💬20) 4 issues created: - How should the receiver react if it receives Connection IDs for non-authorised paths IDs? (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/336 - Add a short name for "Multipath Extension for QUIC" (possibly "Multipath QUIC") and an abbreviation (possibly "MP-QUIC") (by SpencerDawkins) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/335 - Which/how many unused CIDs SHOULD be provided? (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/333 - Should active_connection_id_limit be per path or per connection? (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/332 16 issues received 20 new comments: - #336 How should the receiver react if it receives Connection IDs for non-authorised paths IDs? (1 by michael-eriksson) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/336 [design] [explicit path ID] - #333 Which/how many unused CIDs SHOULD be provided? (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/333 [design] - #328 Designing odd/even path-id, or not. (4 by huitema, michael-eriksson, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/328 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] - #326 The spec doesn't say enough about DPLPMTUD or max_udp_payload_size (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/326 - #325 CID allocation strategy (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/325 - #324 Rename "initial_max_paths / MAX_PATHS" to "intial_max_path_id / MAX_PATH_ID" ? (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/324 [design] [explicit path ID] - #323 Alternative to defining a bunch of MP-specific frames (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/323 - #322 MAX_PATH, sender initiated streams, and CID allocation. (2 by huitema, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/322 [duplicate] - #321 Static path IDs? (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/321 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] - #312 PATH_STANDBY PATH_AVAILABLE Sequence number spaces (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/312 - #311 Simplify reference to whose sequence number space. (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/311 - #307 Clarify requirement to avoid wrapping CID seqenunce number (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/307 [design] - #306 In some situations the ACK frames will be for CID with sequence number 1 (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/306 [design] - #304 Unclear usage of direciton of Path in specifcation text (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/304 - #303 Recommendation on token ambiguity issue is violating RFC 9000 (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/303 - #188 Handling packets with both new Destination Connection ID and 4-tuple (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/188 [has PR] [design] [needs-discussion] 2 issues closed: - MAX_PATH, sender initiated streams, and CID allocation. https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/322 [duplicate] - Handling packets with both new Destination Connection ID and 4-tuple https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/188 [has PR] [design] [needs-discussion] * quicwg/ack-frequency (+1/-0/💬0) 1 issues created: - Idle period clarification (by MikeBishop) https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency/issues/295 Pull requests ------------- * quicwg/multipath (+1/-0/💬4) 1 pull requests submitted: - Editorial pass on explicit Path ID (by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/334 4 pull requests received 4 new comments: - #334 Editorial pass on explicit Path ID (1 by Yanmei-Liu) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/334 - #331 Use even numbers for path ID (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/331 - #329 Split path identifiers as odd-even for client and server initiated (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/329 - #316 [+] Explicit Path ID: Clarify use of MAX_PATHS (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/316 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/datagram * https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers * https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation * https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease * https://github.com/quicwg/qlog * https://github.com/quicwg/quic-v2 * https://github.com/quicwg/multipath * https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency * https://github.com/quicwg/reliable-stream-reset
- Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot