IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 2 Points of First Implementation Draft we might clarify

Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com> Thu, 29 June 2017 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jri@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBA8126C23 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WUHqw2HNiy1H for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com (mail-pf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 990F1124D85 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c73so41073647pfk.2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yyRNROt6W5RJn7cfKBBk3JJNCgeE0tS4J6sHiBmvM64=; b=ORimAFBeq/mk7jiJc/FZ+1xMjSXjVwwDQLxviAYdfLLUI/kO23dwzwz0TII4wpYn/Y fVX+pd6WUGRFDBApUpHL66Odh58U17hugVPWLhxwi3Bh32K98dJ1boQBvrH4eRvuGdhR kZh137fqXx1d9mtjPh1+UbhVG3xwJ1EOu97SSO2znwuPr4KGIAXCf/skg/n+nNQCsapE no9pGRbmWG0q4jOpJpqyunvMoxjUap1AyjcTVR47qlp/us0rJhKsMtNPx/M7lFVa3KWN JxjSVusmF21xuYemEqegFsJEJOY12zr8PG64GI9KiPUshrTH4nehZJY+60cxN55lYZhb /S3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yyRNROt6W5RJn7cfKBBk3JJNCgeE0tS4J6sHiBmvM64=; b=GepF1t+rTeMRyuNgtJRm0PcHWYS7Beujj3mp/ppPCAp3QdYVBZfbLBvnbmBHtrsSCs Wua8vJ+mwLzg4sN/UX8UeKLj2dKMm+toMJQ69nLwlwE9sj9FfZgPUjV4ONrxERgSF52N yNghp7ar07ufGpg3WBkc7uIIrY6EvPvsjU1x3LAe04yVZm/GZMSlbjG0vWgbWp6wyc3j WZsXTPadEO46bbiuc2WhUE9YDPgNqJA7EtwRS3E4VSff52Mm4z8JuNt8uFTGee5L+L5T u4Cqa3JmxRmTrk18CZm42v0sb/2pthIwm629yAdNUWyXUuFC7UPJ193usqHh1Bh6pCVC dnRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyH0ml5KJ4HNqG4Rq72+0WytOIDKpn143VTtkf/vSfpwX35aBGL 26iHea7c8Ujg/hpSGOPMP+qN0JaPKPdd
X-Received: by 10.98.28.71 with SMTP id c68mr13557053pfc.116.1498694409914; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.176.133 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUD3tRdci95TgGqg4xPZeV=knCug=EoNw-S+3oatx_G8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNreiyrk1bpGc5Cu0OXyO1KDGk25USYM7jz5GpXQCdUpfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gMat+zRrBG1WxiE0O7owDqksR8-JAujPxPOT89p3TgtQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gNALLfD7fbpLs=bjFP9oOpx_efJndNtsKT21S5ADDYn1w@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUD3tRdci95TgGqg4xPZeV=knCug=EoNw-S+3oatx_G8Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:00:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGD1bZZRGKdxV=Bx1Qb1t9XER_UsdmFBtC+mmy4qoOey5BvMrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2 Points of First Implementation Draft we might clarify
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c050446ee7ecf05530dfb1d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/QaExkiRri_ewhNKHYY8_1pN9TCA>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:12 -0000

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 28 June 2017 at 14:10, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> wrote:
> > Would only supporting 18 cause problems for anyone?
>
>
> Anyone using OpenSSL would have a real hard time.
>

Is anyone planning to use OpenSSL for the interop?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email