IETF Logo Mail Archive

Greasing more of QUIC

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 07 December 2017 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48FD12420B for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 21:03:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGgfjD5NhvAq for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 21:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22d.google.com (mail-ot0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DBE1200F3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 21:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id y10so5380201otg.10 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 21:03:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mj0rhFeM2IQYx7fWiq//Kgytm4/q9mVZYN4T8YCh7Uc=; b=feg94hpmufHvdPtvV3kkNgZ6r+GcyO8wYyq2hV8U6vLnEtnUkjoexWVUX/Vf8DxdSv myrILLv0y6DsSkjh/4qRsRAeSj4HVR97Zmg9864408c063BEFaSzdUjtNpj6YAeqwj9b 78fjqTpYIM3uP5HKzELNTw12MGm8zJu5dQB7b5i/DMoE7geSPu99jNmPXnisqAgsf2fs K8tbqeGgHp+cU3LnnCXoQHgVO5A8zj4p/sScDD0n0Bp2b3UlTcN6FOruTf8JKJ4Yc9bq YAcwMG0PGhTlsdinOJV2x/DcK7bs68WZvWBvJ5w1OUCO7f6jPIIIZGHv3bUUkZqI/hNg VYXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mj0rhFeM2IQYx7fWiq//Kgytm4/q9mVZYN4T8YCh7Uc=; b=WwPsJ7aHC77YVxBiDPI1StlZOw5D5sbuNmoEyKmJrTijuFuBLNai+CRUi+qdrHD9nM OGcY/mhtakD+gz200DrmHuBiLHo25IQqCw7DSDsUoeBT4B5fJQhmtxcsH1Hx+p0jGXL4 cxH4Bw0pqtYTPgVsnUfACAHRQ4t7BsB6ODHhgbjf74zsiQqBKx7yAS++8GWeiyCO4+r1 9vnyYNn8g9l7zoSeXQmhlcWr2RAPJedf4sarFhq5MF44lHgyJw9MhCHjHCyT+PgfwHko 0VkjRUN6k+7BuN5SCD/z8DvUM7JZ3UVj+kl0z2IgZT0PxQdEOWwyDFRkG9mpq7P5lnsB ixnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5Y/z407lSeDMha7w1lLx5L0ZUn8w+Fn47svg67KZTwKnR7iygS ly98KNOazsytiwPxicZ9g9hBHr4czwjJtF5XbGSkqEluysg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMabKXmcGtPl3n+4riunNsD0GGfrBjmDche8ZK8mQkiSSIqiMNEeWXjwaFir1GjahMUta4hFBYXlSp/EyLis0O4=
X-Received: by 10.157.67.146 with SMTP id t18mr24581059ote.103.1512623035400; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 21:03:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.8.11 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 21:03:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 16:03:54 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUxr3cAv81m5PfzRb+LWbiUq1qaASMnLkG+hEokHR714A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Greasing more of QUIC
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/RE5AKl9vdWikbPnuK9sHLg-dyWs>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 05:03:58 -0000

I've sort of promised a few times, to a few people, that I'd write up
the state of play regarding greasing.  I just did that and it got
somewhat lengthy.  So I decided that I'd put the words in a draft.
Sorry.  That's what you get when publishing drafts gets easier...

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-quic-grease

Based on this, I'm a little more enthusiastic about protecting packet
numbers, mainly for the secondary benefits that come with it.  But
I'll let others reach their own conclusions about that.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email