Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 07 June 2021 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane@sources.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2844A3A4188 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GH_k4VjeETAG for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fe27:3d3f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A17803A4189 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4C533A027A; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 20:53:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 80AD5190B87; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 20:49:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 20:49:26 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Robin MARX <robin.marx=40uhasselt.be@dmarc.ietf.org>, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC
Message-ID: <20210607184926.GA5394@sources.org>
References: <20210607123854.GA16312@nic.fr> <CAC7UV9bkqOeCgDsCH+Hdq0v=zmRKNNDtpfiq6Ap_vzm5zUzGVg@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oZiUe5TyY3Tv432__GH=v+Lpv2EZah0G4ZD+g3E2FkaMg@mail.gmail.com> <20210607130422.GA27971@sources.org> <EE723B6D-7B6B-4B68-A4A1-F1809CF68F1B@gmail.com> <20210607142015.GA31240@sources.org> <C1B56269-0EF7-42EC-8824-70F7485807B2@gmail.com> <bc4714c6-61c4-f384-9d08-f4278264364c@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bc4714c6-61c4-f384-9d08-f4278264364c@huitema.net>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.9
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/RJxam7drkbQ7bY-Qn84nqjzLlak>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 18:53:20 -0000

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 08:21:24AM -0700,
 Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote 
 a message of 211 lines which said:

> QUIC does enable trade-offs between privacy and performance, and
> these trade-offs are not well documented in the published RFC.

Do we think it could be a good addition to
draft-ietf-quic-applicability?