Copies of my slides showing QUIC v. TCP perfomance over asymmetric paths (#3529)
Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Wed, 03 June 2020 18:40 UTC
Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC603A0DE3 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QX5GnoRdmIsH for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648EC3A0DDC for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GF-MacBook-Pro.lan (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F20ED1B00140 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 19:40:28 +0100 (BST)
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Subject: Copies of my slides showing QUIC v. TCP perfomance over asymmetric paths (#3529)
To: quic@ietf.org
Message-ID: <cdd99ef5-5b50-4697-558b-c5f9aa2c0d3c@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 19:40:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/SY_P3pD8pSjL0q7dUq4jK2AGqkU>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 18:40:36 -0000
For those interested, I presented my slides today in PANRG on the impact of QUIC ACKs on performance and the impact of choosing to ACK every other ACK-eliciting packet, and the benefits of using an ACK 1:10 - such as that in Chromium. This relates to #3529, if you missed this and want to see read the slides they are here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2020-panrg-01/materials/slides-interim-2020-panrg-01-sessa-etosat-update Gorry
- Copies of my slides showing QUIC v. TCP perfomanc… Gorry Fairhurst