Re: QUIC - Our schedule and scope

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Tue, 31 October 2017 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0EA13F46A for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QCSGta8gf2cA for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x236.google.com (mail-io0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78EE713F44D for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 134so35404857ioo.0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KR2Usa/xEynZedD82Ncg3lRvmHs7hU6XYUu36hmOeoA=; b=F5AGnT01cw/pPux2DGCIr4YnwFmTSk6b/WQueHcqsz1ct7L7s8LFmNIPAPcrC++6d4 VrK5i0R7yYYfwyySRAFsiM3us9cWTL55RWQg2F1/r/SDaweQP6I0zwtrM22a0O32D6BO Dp7LCkqsgnjxzIFH2x4yscQ9lBkxlDdWh/sArVIWbhJy5yhHIjKMrwE9bGjXZmlOmo7y QU4HPnl33YproNC2x8RQykSp+hj6DkwHEVtlTL18ObwOSmyeHVACoyV5Z2GbGry7tPOe g4ejBKe/UNDCJTAWmKVwQHRWG5wj53i6t4J07ydWF2fIz5hF13P2aIpAgzVehcTQeK3C UFWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KR2Usa/xEynZedD82Ncg3lRvmHs7hU6XYUu36hmOeoA=; b=DI/eBcZnaRAXgFjD8e8JPC5J59OxK+ggm/eufDpdrtq6EfEOyEJPB9A1Dew8WF5/1I 41fYIu+ygyOoG4YNDbb/3BfmEouLDw7BY3bwSD/5MN47U5yxJOEagYQktBRypof2iXCz JDvPWrvi/DKDimjfrjhszWznTEzpfYjt8ZhDZ2yXt1Rnmvv3AQUtGZA/Ynd9zv0wGNr6 ms9AYj4jFj/xztLpfpXuI9LDOJ87jPIUTZegKOWRKKX8DkA5DUKCGOdfrUIH6X0Jml5Z WOIjIeB/LjLck/oiVWJ8ntnz/0sVvUY92gICtUYzDOoiPPW6Kzi/z8G19ylLNMiOhCC4 eBMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXWooGcflaIN6wYg/s5rUkUoGB2obl9Oj6m9jsXy8sDf2IEkK4G JiM4KARz+Eo8lEz0s2VVlvXTPkTv0VrTr0rn+UGpXw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SrewIUtrYXoq2LZEfiRKYUSVZI854NTOP/nKaiWkY2V4pEL5E8TxJzaLhs2l5YoE34KZmG2lYzgqcHPeE540w=
X-Received: by 10.36.227.7 with SMTP id d7mr3218488ith.141.1509459472444; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.130.221 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9500F7AE-D042-43B6-A663-2307D8983A8C@netapp.com>
References: <BCAD8B83-11F7-4D4A-B7B3-FCBF8B45CBB4@mnot.net> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD828A1A@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com> <D6EF62BE-F105-48DF-8BC6-EA55460C8252@netapp.com> <76E33E22-AFEC-481F-AF0A-99EBE92E645E@in-panik.de> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD829F41@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com> <CAM4esxQ18BOVbTC4qyg63+Y4LuUCtuC5V=a7+aLJzLVtfmjtdQ@mail.gmail.com> <9500F7AE-D042-43B6-A663-2307D8983A8C@netapp.com>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:17:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gN7hNAgLf8kU5WLeLAeE-oOrE_do4VupmN5pnR1x=+FLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: QUIC - Our schedule and scope
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, "Philipp S. Tiesel" <phils@in-panik.de>, Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c111b06a92bf6055cd86b80"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Smly2YOhVp59__aFXCJV3klPR7A>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:17:56 -0000

Excellent suggestion Martin.

Lars, what is the name of the new label?  I have at least one issue I'd
like to tag as nonblocking(or ponies, or deferred...).

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On 2017-10-30, at 17:12, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> One practical suggestion: can we create an issue category for "deferred"
> stuff? There are probably a dozen or issues that are good ideas floating
> around (a couple of mine) that we may not have time to address in 2018, but
> shouldn't be lost. I would feel a lot better about my stuff being punted if
> I knew the WG would formally consider it in v2.
>
>
> that is a good suggestion, and I will add that tag in GitHub shortly.
>
> I would like to request that the proposers of such deferred issues bring
> them back at an appropriate time, rather than putting this load on the
> editors, who are already spread to thinly.
>
> Lars
>