IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Interop runner with satellite links

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 30 September 2021 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3863A0CAE; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wGf6Zo4FPn4X; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101063A0C92; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id q81so5422616ybq.5; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=iTgfIr7Bq492QWMBG2IedtgjQv0XB7BuWPoIx7eRU2k=; b=f7J7/HuBqV5ykYBGAFjxuJx4EEA3v5RT08B70yqKhRrKBugio/qF7/Ay6HpqoUFMnN z2b2xEda9MpLBDEy7R5UJE11zlON06HQ+i+oTCKGGogFzpIifJ222+aMFokNIzfo7qmo jyGuXKd5lMdsKHs2r0Dbil4KQygJ/rGwU4gKwUZ34kLkwYapZvY86a8InZMJkUdX3sqv VFEqMfEbaru9lwxMZRMloBqTvfIlFfzNu/2rJXgA4UlaT+R6uy+wayxdXkBGOhlu8JL+ NizT6p8B0nXL4pau/08hqnBgoSMQ9+1czi70CSOJ7QD3Nn8vWseuRpOR0pMAzm+RrJei b2Zg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iTgfIr7Bq492QWMBG2IedtgjQv0XB7BuWPoIx7eRU2k=; b=dRNHWcpcudQriVGC4haLRTXd2BJzRUkNHSh2get3YRmIFxJjPTjV24LUIMXAgqHCsU 8i+slLkM7mno2chcmzc2YuWfATnkIjU0b3NTXRTbfSRCgacTJidy4e5JF0MqcZwcShD/ DX/d1EeIJvRaD4qgA1EWPLi1ZvoRzH962ZUKGW0xdO6ggiMMaUd80eyWoN2q+3L7eAkx tJ7G150swuJl6PaX0WjwV8J8PhZqgXsrrrJEcPWFrNIm1FJDWCeuSKZCQo579shwnQKg 4EO+gJYbPkt6VKeBU1w9Y/LOYFemekpfkH5pylTEYzXsPG4q2plddNLngXbSTXUM4fon eWeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BT38O66Is36uSl9qzn0N5szZW34/PMlm1LsIQfZnq+80olQju /Z1wiCeQ9xCrQpiHQCgfhGg2oo2J+ePhjkTYrcM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQFF81opkLKeXnbwo72vKaeW2HmiQnojkOLHIJGYKHv4qWrIrDoNx3CIvue3v/6/uWCS6Go/w1xuQAbnxhgUw=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d258:: with SMTP id j85mr7664324ybg.398.1633012189640; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2572762.KRHqeOQrTU@7b74a564-70da-4baa-82f8-b74434554dd0>
In-Reply-To: <2572762.KRHqeOQrTU@7b74a564-70da-4baa-82f8-b74434554dd0>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:29:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfHcptehK2VkTkEmD2RdLGJ+LC=vfqSdYsGDZPW9A4TvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Interop runner with satellite links
To: Sebastian Endres <basti.endres@fau.de>
Cc: etosat@ietf.org, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Joerg Deutschmann <joerg.deutschmann@fau.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007a3cc505cd3747f9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Sxr6LBGS9zi41bRnJ-liKPrxrbg>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:29:56 -0000

Hi Sebastian,



On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 2:58 PM Sebastian Endres <basti.endres@fau.de>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> for my master's thesis we ran measurements of all publicly available QUIC
> implementations over an emulated satellite link. The results are available
> online: https://interop.sedrubal.de/
>
> A click on the results also shows time-offset plots, but are not available
> for every combination.
>
> In general, the performance of QUIC over high latency (e.g., geostationary
> satellites) is rather poor, especially if there is packet loss.
>
> Would it make sense to add such tests with challenging link
> characteristics to the official QUIC interop runner?
>
>

I don't have an answer to this question.
My suggestion is to run some tests over LEO satellite links like Starlink.


Behcet

> Best regards,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email