Call for Adoption: QCRAM

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 05 February 2018 06:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB466126CD6 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 22:07:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=RvsPbAYd; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=XTqLnVt9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQJ9kcxUT_Zv for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 22:07:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A70D126D74 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 22:07:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B0120B4C; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 01:07:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 05 Feb 2018 01:07:57 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=U6pQRwu5nKwrqow9Nsho2qwZZJ8dupHH3oILbYiFjSY=; b=RvsPbAYd l6uEFu2/C0KPt9rA3AsQ78/vBNz/F4nLAto4yq3FZur9Z0PmqYtSe0X51wTz1yrh 1f+jI0aTQND41OLranOO2E5yTCgD8AmORS9BLTi9cBaIRaIdECnev8+Rt0tJL/LQ 3f7nROJLrkkOA4IiQuaaFdVHrizSNhbS4aXdupx96jpf0t+xuQNpBFqRJetWcBTe 73wli019LtMqm6/OOn5u6kCYolrs4/yrKvobyRBQbElJE2yZcr/0vSC9DQgXZ6Jf tjt/Dg0MALg9RbwmPGGT5UpV8aYJ81Q4i6ysm0NrEoeg6zU1WbPmplVkqSSDfWWY w5bagSNq7H51WA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=U6pQRwu5nKwrqow9Nsho2qwZZJ8du pHH3oILbYiFjSY=; b=XTqLnVt9Xv2DgLuDGs8owozGa0g9vOolBRb7v1yKMSxks DARxsZj48p1Vm1CKt47HEd+68MI4H9Eh0O61tkWqwLLKPme7aZVi4PXS0ABBzijb lK0/FbaJp9jPUvJwN2TpEoHfRUOGkCVYw4OWblGGKlRm2Hk+/sIz6QXsKxmlZBeR 5Z0dBZS4FUSpwiYJBmWjbuxSEZPD/9jDHnkZV3aDrXpLU5n4QPbsdgLP9Y5WjUFK uM4mfk7I4ImoorOpqCPOgYUVMBOEutF8E75Ung4rh/+BhOycsGsHTfdtlBRefGDS l5AXqYiXMa10YpVZQ9ak0Y7AqYtlXSUSOAcYUxAQQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:vfR3WrzhwO3wF9NhWHgi-7mV-AsM3r8Ljms62Wt8UYXpYhJhnI2aZA>
Received: from [192.168.1.18] (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C37BD241E0; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 01:07:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Subject: Call for Adoption: QCRAM
Message-Id: <6A834DB6-F2A5-4973-83CD-8AAA82945372@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 17:07:55 +1100
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Szj_NKeMfpGtI_ERBzP5WY59gIc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 06:08:00 -0000

In Melbourne, there was strong support (with a small amount of pushback which was discussed) for adopting QCRAM:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krasic-quic-qcram-04

Any objections / concerns about doing so? Unless we hear otherwise, we'll adopt at the end of the week.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/