IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus Calls for Late Stage Documents

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 17 January 2020 04:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0701120099 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:39:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=M4/GPMlw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=GHqDQJzV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nHi9TOZuDZGF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:39:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A4A1200CD for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:39:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC372202A; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 23:39:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 23:39:20 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=c /ixPSitx96NWcsPxxCt2w2x767Sk8+qOiDqNifhUy0=; b=M4/GPMlw9Qq3ZXY/1 uH6L2Nmtwb6ODcgSYFxQDZXCPj8EGeDfanZNmKk3nhe28p8JQRnVCFrUcnG3u7zG hoF7MOJya1+TT/lJIsHaDbwb8+RJmu7+1Lb7Y+7EFtTTPoaCmpSJSzlk04b2Lq/x ++IkqFwXxOaP6yyUdrd+2kCQ7maensQFRBk4+GwzHmNGJroekI+4rfvXtu1Wc5Nd ppx2qrfoSCJw9yhpEKw112qNyQLHDeJ5TYP50dlidisVI7cfaqk2qDlkNO+6qXPe cf9yWE+gpKC1Qjdf4NTnltNq9In3pVkY7Tq+W3O2UVkZ/9j+zn7z2pWIMbcGtVuu QH++w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=c/ixPSitx96NWcsPxxCt2w2x767Sk8+qOiDqNifhU y0=; b=GHqDQJzVGfqjctqMMlQkYu71O1a07VVYp+wy0fhcgqP1XJRa29noNPlOZ 4wquF90qaFvqaybrTUP1rj8nTMGq8Yu+NJ9xfuHoARw9CXswrUHiu3JxhZ3v1fJf NDdWOGIEnjiln1clBFVcgX+AahkF0IWBzw2aA+hMnCr/LNkhn4UG0/aQThJn5NZq it9nvkTevhg/4zU1mThoQwHxF/MlDknGZdhwCw08KQkQjt+gq5+NQpTZBHrclpID mECaWy2RK7xtwopt93BdoELkaw+0Rnwf3++M2g3qQPQBDVS55nfdc2PrIlU66TYj cVbyr7zmOdT+yS/1rwEBsYp102JcA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:dzohXiN8Z1lz6gq5mhMC2VJiNhQJTF-38bhssVOcf96Wh0tGRuICjg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrtdeigdejtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpe hgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppedurddugeefrdduheefrddv geegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:dzohXiiKiQclIzf7z3-B-kXQTzGascm2j0caZZAj78-aQwSST1fvzA> <xmx:dzohXohZGhsneCDBehZ4i56twhQYugKYnu58C_ZZdjX7vGzvsQCTZg> <xmx:dzohXpIgB9sebL4Z2vsHRjx-bEN-RA-dY3R7fLaEtQM5LnfqCso8dw> <xmx:eDohXuGdTRZD68fBQSJFKxcH4WQKn6efqbCBl2YUFnsK1ClhQVKZKg>
Received: from [IPv6:2001:8004:1303:387:5c31:e881:537e:f5a2] (unknown [1.143.153.244]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 70C7E80061; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 23:39:16 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
Subject: Re: Consensus Calls for Late Stage Documents
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <43D8DACA-C1C4-449A-A4BC-4F0E6F8F1CAB@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:39:09 +1000
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <983BC131-67E6-4DE1-A40F-0587E28B2085@mnot.net>
References: <43D8DACA-C1C4-449A-A4BC-4F0E6F8F1CAB@mnot.net>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/UCBxWSPndAnvtbRuF46zJnHcqdY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 04:39:24 -0000

Seeing no pushback, consensus is declared for all but #3094, where discussion will continue.


> On 6 Jan 2020, at 1:56 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> Happy New Year, Working Group.
> 
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them late next week.
> 
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
> 
> * #3274: Encrypting Retry token
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274>
> 
> * #3247: I am concerned the congestion control text is too permissive.
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248>
> 
> * #3245: Make RFC 6928 normative
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3287>
> 
> * #3244: Can we make a normative ref to  RFC8085?
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248>
> 
> * #3243: Add caution when using IW10 and fragmentation 
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3280>
> 
> * #3152: Client storage of tokens should be independent of other stored state
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3150>
> 
> * #3142: It is unspecified how a server sends Handshake packets during / after migration
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3145>
> 
> * #3094: congestion window increase on every ACKed packet could result in bursty sends
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3232>
> 
> * #3014: Handling of corrupt Retry packets
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274>
> 
> * #2863: unrecoverable loss pattern leads to deadlock
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3145>
> 
> * #2789: Use a higher seed RTT for new paths
>   The proposal is to close with no action.
> 
> * #2744: Idle Timer Can Fire Even with Outstanding Data to Send
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3266>
> 
> * #2602: Idle timeout needs more description and a recommendation
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3099>
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email