Review of QUIC Applicability: draft-ietf-quic-applicability-09
Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Sat, 06 February 2021 12:35 UTC
Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B223A11F7 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 04:35:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cjs6Xa--BZPY for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 04:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.19.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ACB3A11F3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 04:35:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from GF-MacBook-Pro.lan (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C85FD1B00082 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 12:35:18 +0000 (GMT)
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Subject: Review of QUIC Applicability: draft-ietf-quic-applicability-09
To: quic@ietf.org
Message-ID: <d9573c60-7185-a8d4-efd5-f3821e61708f@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:35:18 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5E9DC004BA97751FE7BD05AA"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/UNhIdsWCoJacSQkMGYIIqpLvivA>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:35:26 -0000
I have just completed a review of the applicability draft ( draft-ietf-quic-applicability-09). I saw quite a few places where the text would really benefit from some clarity to avoid potential misreading, but I expect most of this work is editorial (see Issue #205). In general this looks like a useful document that I think should be published by the WG after resolving the issues in WGLC. I recorded the following WGLC issues in github. Best wishes, Gorry === App/Ops: Server deployments with load balancers <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/206> #206 opened1 minute agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Ref: Transport BEHAVE Specs <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/204> #204 opened11 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Ref: TAPS API work: on TCP fallback / API? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/203> #203 opened12 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Ref: Sect 1: Cite RFC8055 here? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/202> #202 opened13 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> 1 <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/202> App: Sec 14: Security Considerations reference to transport BCP? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/201> #201 opened14 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Use (and do not need to use) of ICMP <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/200> #200 opened17 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Section 12 on Versioning<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/199> #199 opened19 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Ref: Should the text ion DSCP also cite RFC7657? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/198> #198 opened21 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: What does "prime a CC" mean? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/197> #197 opened22 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: ... interference by network elements such as firewalls <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/196> #196 opened24 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Port Usage uses RFC2119 word? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/195> #195 opened25 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> Padding explanation needs to mention DPLPMTUD <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/194> #194 opened26 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Sect 4.3. Flow Control - we should have a subsection also encouraging timely credits <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/193> #193 opened27 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: End of Sect 2: RFC2119 Keyword? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/192>
- Review of QUIC Applicability: draft-ietf-quic-app… Gorry Fairhurst