Re: Consensus call for Late-Stage documents, pre-IETF 108 edition

[Lucas Pardue <[e-mail]>]

Hi folks,

The consensus call has now ended.

We saw some pushback on the proposed resolution to #3842. Discussion on an
alternative proposal is continuing so we'll run this issue through the
Late-Stage process again.

There appears to be no pushback on the other issues, so consensus is
declared.

Kind regards
Lars, Lucas and Mark
QUIC WG Chairs

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:00 AM Lucas Pardue <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Folks,
>
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far
> seems
> to support consensus to accept them. Therefore, we are starting a 1-week
> consensus call. If you object to a proposal, please do so on the issue or
> in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent
> any
> pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate proposals once the call
> concludes.
>
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current
> state of
> issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at
> <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
>
>
> * #3880: How long is a validated address good for?
>   The proposal is to lose with no action.
>
> * #3875: Persistent congestion threshold is unreliable during the early
> stages of a connection
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3889>
>
> * #3860: incorrect error code used for invalid RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3861>
>
> * #3845: What does "MUST reduce" mean?
>   The proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3864
>
> * #3842: Do I need to reset congestion info when the port changes?
>   The proposal is to close with no action.
>
> * #3834: Remove amplification throttle if the server receives Initial that
> echoes its high entropy SCID.
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3924>
>
> * #3808: Versions are for endpoints
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3785>
>
> * #3800: Coalescing different CIDs for same connection
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3930>
>
> Cheers,
> Lars, Lucas and Mark
> QUIC WG Chairs
>