Re: Rechartering QUIC for Post Version 1 Work

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Tue, 26 January 2021 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8AC3A0EA7 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:00:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zf8WmuN8yx-2 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 055B33A0EA1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id m13so3512118wro.12 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:00:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XxqYjbTj8TKlxPV94AkT0mNUbHWmVHG9XiiDAYaCq4s=; b=pdajewRmlL0zpg7zOxDPLKJVGHDX2FLARWRp8Fpy5YGYIBk7y3p1Gk+2e+0qxmsCkL yIAu4hsn10pVgz53NiESTc7TiOBMwOG35Oa50kh2duwuFVIDEYtyfvkVo1UvgFFSXM9e 3X9lXmC9g0BkB3ObKlna3ZMwRDP2nXVLKZafXvmDhW58RRjpRKNUV/fcVpI9dQW+/NqD iLR3T+1BoIWByg4xua3W4xtiSNsUMNrplCelPlAhRddeKvPG7vNAB4zSG4+av4voZgrd BdSgAN0u27O80xoZiljsXod96rjPkfHVChzSzgBVYkLjz6xBTYmMX0yUsf2/MPaecJ0K ULEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=XxqYjbTj8TKlxPV94AkT0mNUbHWmVHG9XiiDAYaCq4s=; b=ZTI9PlO6vP5UFpDXveZ8WB6Nv0hiQyWvn0/EzKvBswHFfzOXffr5qkiDY9VYmgyiOO t7gtkhKT6ha4/FoQWlCXBWxleRxaTG3RdmzuXl1UgJyW37rlVafrWO9zr7x4WyU2kCPu GA8R3i7oZ6jFxlGeC+rgM06tUHke5/i6rrlRQgrFJU11T9HbkF2r0CWeurncNqggiJS9 MKSBmY/iH8XEo616N6jSEJV38jqtvxAJad1UNw8dGwJ8h8IyhUZRhz7Y8Te3IrP3uuwb N5D3vwzUjUXM4kisSEVK7lDns2z+jeQnNlfmZeN7ANcrkrfKbM3RaDsBZlKit3QtFzuQ Aicg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kdjrorvkccZvzzlCvhmQw9K19CebuGRzCt9+za8aWZFROWwP4 SJSCIpssGc7DGLZLPBU3U3yOwIFzriyAwOefmzdUG3t99x96TA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzsaEH75aCG0gl+kot1ycE5OMoLtTfZubdyzyHT+TP4TSkZ1n6kgl97uXq15anSCS9zqQO3rc0yQxdnUkncAJw=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4c4f:: with SMTP id n15mr8169911wrt.124.1611694831208; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:00:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9oaXpZp87ujmkDAO6Tuy=m-s8qKDY9-azpm_PhVAMfkq9A@mail.gmail.com> <20210126170048.GB364092@okhta> <D01160E4-C89E-4DF5-B0A7-C5138E33D9C1@eggert.org> <20210126170932.GC364092@okhta> <CALGR9oaO8Q7TC9zyajM20gZkZPR1cRDSv-SeDqo0MfaQbgfAjg@mail.gmail.com> <20210126184815.GD364092@okhta>
In-Reply-To: <20210126184815.GD364092@okhta>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:00:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gNXkCko=H3VofwnubMDctCN7Smx0LDbH-ruYcTk7S4kTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rechartering QUIC for Post Version 1 Work
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e6ee6005b9d3f1f9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/UsX0sVAzW-TkxxGBdI6e0N8w3Vw>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:00:39 -0000

In the past, I felt there was quite a bit of resistance to accepting new
documents not explicitly listed in the charter, which makes me share some
of Dmitri's concerns.

Mentioning qlog specifically made me a bit nervous, because the other
examples were worded broadly enough that they could encompass different
drafts if needed.

Minus that concern, LGTM.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:48 PM Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
wrote:

> OK, hopefully that's how it works out in the end.
>
> Thanks,
>
>   - Dmitri.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 05:27:11PM +0000, Lucas Pardue wrote:
> > Waiting for the new documents to get proposed and adopted, as a new
> > precedent for future work in this area doesn't IMO help much. We already
> > have precedents, which I trust the WG to be capable of applying without
> > being too literal.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Lucas
>
>