Re: Consensus Calls for Transport/TLS issues, pre-Singapore

Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com> Thu, 28 November 2019 00:58 UTC

Return-Path: <martenseemann@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4051D120BBE for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:58:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AvHT10MHLUnN for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:58:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7F201208F8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id m6so19140411ljc.1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:58:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MuyAQ7BlQlDL6Fy7AFM5sBRybzppCVudqgQvHQ9+sb8=; b=K7ZiUaZvTHzM/XJo6kyvX1nrQvvVAFD1igUYQokY8TljyM8ry9KoP1C9N0LLk1VQjR SfILC6j55FXVrimOX529VHcAZ/RrxNztXlZT7od5jXdjwuuBf5jj8rEk0e4BwP9nQXa4 3LQGpW247eDwTwJgZsMGGSZMkw+9bjoRAuqBNUTVh9sJbkBwVUGxzcAo8ImQz9efMJp9 V87imJZEx8GSRnaxhD76P/asZ0yWPcFOhp6A2q0tAIiQctxz/DZFYjfIRmlYE4C2kJR/ craX4apK9NKkv1c6USQCP4mQNa/Z9E7V4vK/1NMbmmgU1tHw9duHjUIHUneOAH8pYwYS XERA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MuyAQ7BlQlDL6Fy7AFM5sBRybzppCVudqgQvHQ9+sb8=; b=MydsGQNYotlRzmxaQk1IctygTQpDuRag5VwiRex7uMmlaSN5wZSmPIQgKd6pN9DcxT d4mvKXlkm4DRyzX59rLlgD9cFd3lZpKkG4j3l6F129l2frDN4xpFIJwSqmNeFtDBv+n0 jDa7fcUD15j0At38DTdJMlcpXCdsEeGhjsRtYtkKbL7Apr8SlOjboHCE3uJ5CMBW77qq 6ROsR/4hA7Q68N1j+JiF2BZebuKhSAesQJZrXaBFRTbAlYM7h4ZX6E2FfSmJHTksz8Xs 38Z+acV4QxIw85Z1by6Q1oBeW0yrmIsplBuecUArwtfQChbk+/KfSPCYJK3dLzo6KIaC iajQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV8yPoeTfkU44i1JQpOWqZKbtDhTmj+iyL36Sf8K9qN5mUKkPgM jacVhnTokOcIrxHkJaEMkH2D75Q4sSHbJNIwZtA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2LHHX18Qx1W4xfE8TQuRLG1QcLXHH/jswANrfARoSDwL7rWRs7ONhLXaGB9FwAALtfVmkLlqxuQJYtKcWbEE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9356:: with SMTP id m22mr20314366ljh.160.1574902734802; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:58:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <67289EB8-3A37-4231-A3F9-FB46509152A0@mnot.net> <CABcZeBNP7KjMp-usoa6P+KEBg-wz7uOhMjQZxjOEQi2V65ZJ6A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNP7KjMp-usoa6P+KEBg-wz7uOhMjQZxjOEQi2V65ZJ6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 07:58:43 +0700
Message-ID: <CAOYVs2r8jOxanOiE5TQUSVvnQAmgG00y13NcCO3=15eT2K0vbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus Calls for Transport/TLS issues, pre-Singapore
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001052b905985d9e3f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/VD-dd8L-T0YIS3mY91DiRpJJj18>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:58:59 -0000

I commented on #3107 a couple of days ago:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3107#pullrequestreview-321895279.

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:59 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> I think some changes are in order in 3155 and 3014. Comments made in the PR
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 5:26 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far
>> seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on
>> the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject
>> appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to
>> incorporate them late next week. Note that by default we won't discuss
>> these issues in Singapore, unless something comes up.
>>
>> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current
>> state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <
>> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>gt;.
>>
>> * #3127: NEW_TOKEN and Retry tokens must be distinguishable
>>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3128
>>
>> * #3158: Application close should be disallowed in Initial or Handshake
>>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3164
>>
>> * #3155: The method of identifying "the same server"
>>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3156
>>
>> * #2475: Invalid CONNECTION_CLOSE frames
>>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3231
>>
>> * #3168: Allow servers to close connections immediately when the token is
>> corrupted
>>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3107
>>
>> * #3194: reordered NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames with retired sequence numbers
>> shouldn't be used
>>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3202
>>
>> * #3014: Handling of corrupt Retry packets
>>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120
>>
>> * #3095: Backoff of CONNECTION_CLOSE needs to be a MUST
>>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3157
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>
>>