Weekly github digest ( Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 01 December 2019 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062CB120048 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 23:32:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=SC5Dc54m; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=cUjZzX2O
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TWBGcOExRetN for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 23:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F25A212001A for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 23:32:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEB922A4F for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 02:32:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 Dec 2019 02:32:33 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=1GSXH328OJ8b4KWPloHERgQE0v6p/1a9jaebU7TCHOI=; b=SC5Dc54m DxUZ+znaCzlGYpq73qOsBcWzSQaAYICOQVTHOmAUc3cLUGtKAyx75RcPF3zVwDKE SU6sd4i2wiIbnGOeBl2Iy9sscHuEu1qjeEEW5EZIl1TC+bycCZqWZjTxTjdZVvOi 6Kc3i+HQchwhFjuN/3Ago84NFGMpHu9Phg7EZuGIVL+Bdhd57xTxgXWHCXlexr6h R5DOibzcRdsvF29+j1O00KBoccqGZnCH6GykQb7tto2BAWsfKV830d2gQtvRsUfW a6krn7siyXhCbFgvqj6Z5c60YLn6MNPcuIgIyzIl0oydNIfux0WCGNXZaXRpsDVS qqqs3AMrdTlJQA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=1GSXH328OJ8b4KWPloHERgQE0v6p/ 1a9jaebU7TCHOI=; b=cUjZzX2OmDI/ntchDVDiediOEZIKS8wX5xk9LqObA3WnL 8r4G9lsVqHunXyU/UQ9zfsi6nAfs16PBhR6ajQr5vqCkjN2Y9Ta974enjy+nBkcB IMJ9L9IfERy6kwVFWeO4DLeJcQhZyu2OJ4eQ4E9deEF2UjXISo2A3bEy5v8176Hj gz7cBFIdUSNUkQECDw/f87YQU8aPt+0zJmY3x9xz5u2amNORRZXsMlXiGa42olm+ BOb7JjCmT08pvKCX+JklFUx4ZRgu2BvtNKGdWM6oM0Inb6u747oWVDT+9+iP2uOa WOfsJfbAR5A/TRtXw2hoQ6YelS/lVIT95vzu82zww==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:kWzjXTsdPkMoCpzq0I3DQ-FAxFSoLYMcl2yS7TYifTqxR7nzUWDbLA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudejvddguddtjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinh epghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppedufeejrdduudejrdejuddrudekfeenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvthenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:kWzjXbq59E6JaR_gSxbd6GbfImNXTNtsoqrlkRMoCvtTmzVEvFSi2Q> <xmx:kWzjXbIm56j001qtMDUM-oVS7BOECJpURpemWc2pDm0u3t-HhfqJNg> <xmx:kWzjXa7PybnqJFIyz9dC_Mn5Kzzl1DyDK-O2KhwINIxugMTrjAeYDg> <xmx:kWzjXfEi68qrIZgmf6nQB9Es085y0Z7YHhZO3UR4ocCF_RNmEHkcGA>
Received: from [10.1.0.4] (unknown [137.117.71.183]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 03FCD30600CB for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 02:32:33 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============4244850175753052454=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest ( Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20191201073233.03FCD30600CB@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 02:32:33 -0500
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/VsQ6diaUR3MCAGI7D8OhWHerAEE>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 07:32:38 -0000



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+3/-6/💬48)
  3 issues created:
  - Ambiguous wording about error codes in HTTP/3 (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3276 
  - Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (by kazuho)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3275 
  - Encrypting Retry token (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274 [-tls] 

  11 issues received 48 new comments:
  - #3276 Ambiguous wording about error codes in HTTP/3 (2 by LPardue, kazuho)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3276 
  - #3275 Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (20 by LPardue, RyanAtGoogle, dtikhonov, kazuho, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3275 [-http] 
  - #3274 Encrypting Retry token (5 by kazuho, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274 [-tls] 
  - #3273 HTTP/3 references QUIC Stream IDs directly, allowing illegal references (7 by LPardue, RyanAtGoogle, dtikhonov, ianswett, kazuho, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3273 [-http] [design] 
  - #3272 pto_count should be reset when dropping a packet number space (5 by ianswett, janaiyengar, kazuho)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3272 [-recovery] [design] 
  - #3265 Add capability for sending HTTP metadata (trailer fields) in mid-stream (1 by mnot)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3265 [-http] [design] 
  - #3247 I am concerned the congestion control text is too permissive. (1 by janaiyengar)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3247 [-recovery] 
  - #3244 Can we make a normative ref to  RFC8085? (1 by janaiyengar)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3244 [-recovery] 
  - #3216 Flow Control Tuning (2 by gorryfair, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3216 [-transport] 
  - #3212 Remove handshake confirmed test for KeyUpdate (2 by kazuho, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3212 [-tls] [design] 
  - #3142 It is unspecified how a server sends Handshake packets during / after migration (2 by kazuho, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3142 [-transport] 

  6 issues closed:
  - reordered NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames with retired sequence numbers shouldn't be used https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3194 [-transport] [design] [has-consensus] 
  - NEW_TOKEN and Retry tokens must be distinguishable https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3127 [-transport] [design] [has-consensus] 
  - Application close should be disallowed in Initial or Handshake https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3158 [-transport] [design] [has-consensus] 
  - The method of identifying "the same server" https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3155 [-transport] [design] [has-consensus] 
  - Invalid CONNECTION_CLOSE frames https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2475 [-transport] [design] [has-consensus] 
  - Backoff of CONNECTION_CLOSE needs to be a MUST https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3095 [-transport] [design] [has-consensus] 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+0/-6/💬12)
  5 pull requests received 12 new comments:
  - #3266 Prevent Idle Timeout while Blocked (1 by nibanks)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3266 [-transport] 
  - #3248 Fix congestion control permissiveness (6 by gorryfair, hardie, ianswett, janaiyengar, martinthomson, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248 [-recovery] 
  - #3239 HTTP: Tweak wording about unknown error codes (2 by LPardue, janaiyengar)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3239 
  - #3201 enforce the active_connection_id_limit (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3201 [-transport] [design] 
  - #3120 Add retry integrity tag (2 by huitema, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120 [-tls] [-transport] [design] 

  6 pull requests merged:
  - handle reordered NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3202 [-transport] [design] 
  - Mandatory distinction between token types
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3128 [-transport] [design] 
  - Forbid use of application-level close in Initial, Handshake packets
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3164 [-transport] [design] 
  - clarify the scope of a NEW_TOKEN token
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3156 [-transport] [design] 
  - Bad CONNECTION_CLOSE isn't special
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3231 [-transport] [design] 
  - Backoff on CONNECTION_CLOSE
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3157 [-transport] [design] 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts