Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 02 June 2024 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3B0C14F69F for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="EJLJ4T5c"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="LtuI8eOb"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e1QN3FUCHCe8 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.147]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F5DC14F60E for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EA81C0014A for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:38:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 Jun 2024 03:38:25 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1717313904; x=1717400304; bh=1n6JahWenIQTz4tEmhCojHuGdojMTvfANhx 8pRTQ3V4=; b=EJLJ4T5cYg5HYFPXFPGUbndrvypnWdtU9zVD5GyTZrYA3WzSoE6 y2wmQY+MuBAJj9vJvQbeeucXg4T80liZZnfNUAxBR3od+n+A5s31I9q1HnKtryiy VrSa5/3fkjeDYJqAzXExEJ3PCQMsjhljAGYUPGkzCPCg4QkboRrPpVHiJyL5MIMc eJ6vPSHlCEbBZK1ZG/Riu+mUPMWetl0XbkdVX0NHrDtXDeKyiQtmF0kXlp/AIWHp rmhlUGeguriBlLpDAg+mBpVtQ4xnFRCIKgF8lAAdLdql0BbNTAL3/nj1tu6axA5a rWA0ky8FflGTGmcPIWqNdmACf2eNZnnZ2Ew==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1717313904; x= 1717400304; bh=1n6JahWenIQTz4tEmhCojHuGdojMTvfANhx8pRTQ3V4=; b=L tuI8eObYD7CEuqPWUOeXHpQ9ZzWZEC6rjG3UFE5W3G75EsqS9F+vVeGPZyY943E2 xRIZ3kVlftNEoJVbzBA5dIXv8a/ipasHyhw4tIgKmfwW09KFnZh85ceHKf0ENztN MCduy/EGY9blPSjM1lN2UghNRhTFVDMRhfyCyWnrQZVKV06cHdmZopJY6mr+HR6Y fWj5EcDBkgi+xPozR1nKDqGpVkvyfxk24FQCEhXq74UHqHv7HWnlGEArXkPbSyRS YD4sJ8MYpFSPPfzhKWfDMYuPx3WMqgxbOLJ0biF0U6yz7+z28e+LcCJXrQnL50Dk YbdwB/zaMT4WYesuOTvFA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:cCFcZp3E2rX7Lg7pPPV4ohh9qwMJvu5D3TqDVYtyGicFzKC8T75faA> <xme:cCFcZgHhfKmwquaRcJV85UG2RyovQDkmMiSEVvRzFJjj1XVN6665Ndl1RT5EJnBHr 0swr1A-C0slnW9F8g>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:cCFcZp4Ln54Dh1JBDnTolidYi2imYmax0t_uiGUNvDuYD9qLjxdWH8ebUa6y7VHL>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdekledguddvtdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:cCFcZm1Ss2z7A9VvkNmd6XjYh_bgZVUfBXcaDSTuYkns2arkHz7WOg> <xmx:cCFcZsHKJyMX4d2T4L2nCJ11-Jr_LjzdnzDtCs9UMEg9d-mCeyUXfA> <xmx:cCFcZn9W7YAr0cEvNJoqVj1ddnvvLrxGJebPy37-6zfCJSkaqHuenA> <xmx:cCFcZpl_dXKgWQ-KzbLfGteFa70EExyA1tC32JDUoMszCNWCqHd5Dw> <xmx:cCFcZhQPvyhdA3LODlUdCl9ubTDV__NXxi6i9WlZIQkhQY0ZgkDN2RrM>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:38:24 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============2335802710708163890=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20240602073829.40F5DC14F60E@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 00:38:29 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: T2ZKKYSG2EXVDTCCASMPUPHEK26NT573
X-Message-ID-Hash: T2ZKKYSG2EXVDTCCASMPUPHEK26NT573
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-quic.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/W6A6cYvrqFpxmhEUYiZgVT--3fY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:quic-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:quic-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:quic-leave@ietf.org>



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/💬0)
  1 issues created:
  - DCID defintion (by zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/229 

* quicwg/multipath (+6/-9/💬29)
  6 issues created:
  - Should the seq number space of MP_NEW_CONNECTION_ID be per-path or global? (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/371 
  - How should a client signal that it does not have enough CIDs to use for multiple unused path identifiers? (by yfmascgy)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/370 
  - Details of MP_NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames are still missing (by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/368 
  - We should not require explicit MP_RETIRE_CID after PATH_ABANDON (by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/367 
  - Should we require explicit Abandon after path time-out? (by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/366 
  - Where does RFC9000 talk about "refusing a path"? (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/362 

  16 issues received 29 new comments:
  - #371 Should the seq number space of MP_NEW_CONNECTION_ID be per-path or global? (1 by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/371 
  - #370 How should a client signal that it does not have enough CIDs to use for multiple unused path identifiers? (2 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/370 [duplicate] 
  - #367 We should not require explicit MP_RETIRE_CID after PATH_ABANDON (3 by huitema, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/367 [duplicate] [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - #366 Should we require explicit Abandon after path time-out? (2 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/366 
  - #347 Are MP_PATH_(AVAILABLE|STANDBY) probing frames? (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/347 [no-action-needed] 
  - #344 Retiring paths doesn't allow new ones (2 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/344 [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - #333 Which/how many unused CIDs SHOULD be provided? (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/333 [duplicate] [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - #332 Should active_connection_id_limit be per path or per connection? (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/332 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] 
  - #328 Designing odd/even path-id, or not. (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/328 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] 
  - #325 CID allocation strategy (2 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/325 [duplicate] [question] [explicit path ID] 
  - #324 Rename "initial_max_paths / MAX_PATHS" to "intial_max_path_id / MAX_PATH_ID" ? (2 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/324 [question] [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - #321 Static path IDs? (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/321 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] 
  - #313 When to CID expire if using Unique Path ID? (6 by MikeBishop, huitema, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/313 [explicit path ID] 
  - #298 Clarify use of MAX_PATHS  and client created new paths (2 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/298 [has PR] [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - #297 Should Path IDs be reused or not? (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/297 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] 
  - #295 Is RETIRE_PATH_ID needed? (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/295 [design] [explicit path ID] 

  9 issues closed:
  - We should not require explicit MP_RETIRE_CID after PATH_ABANDON https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/367 [duplicate] [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - Retiring paths doesn't allow new ones https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/344 [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - Which/how many unused CIDs SHOULD be provided? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/333 [duplicate] [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - Clarify use of MAX_PATHS  and client created new paths https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/298 [has PR] [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - Rename "initial_max_paths / MAX_PATHS" to "intial_max_path_id / MAX_PATH_ID" ? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/324 [question] [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - How should a client signal that it does not have enough CIDs to use for multiple unused path identifiers? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/370 [duplicate] 
  - CID allocation strategy https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/325 [duplicate] [question] [explicit path ID] 
  - Should Path IDs be reused or not? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/297 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] 
  - Is RETIRE_PATH_ID needed? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/295 [design] [explicit path ID] 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/multipath (+5/-4/💬6)
  5 pull requests submitted:
  - Cleanup MAX_PATHS (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/372 
  - Clarify path id retirement (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/365 
  - Clarify path ID limit for Nonce in intro (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/364 
  - Fix path state section and structure or sections (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/363 
  - Remove things on NEW/RETIRE_CID that have been normatively specified … (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/361 

  2 pull requests received 6 new comments:
  - #365 Clarify path id retirement (3 by huitema, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/365 
  - #361 Remove things on NEW/RETIRE_CID that have been normatively specified … (3 by huitema, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/361 

  4 pull requests merged:
  - Fix path state section and structure of sections
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/363 
  - Clarify path id retirement
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/365 
  - Remove things on NEW/RETIRE_CID that have been normatively specified …
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/361 
  - fix definition of MAX_PATHS frame
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/354 

* quicwg/ack-frequency (+0/-1/💬0)
  1 pull requests merged:
  - Gorry's editorial comments
    https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency/pull/296 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease
* https://github.com/quicwg/qlog
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-v2
* https://github.com/quicwg/multipath
* https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency
* https://github.com/quicwg/reliable-stream-reset