Re: Unrecoverable loss pattern

Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com> Mon, 26 February 2018 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496AE12D0C3 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:33:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aHmFojBg9BUs for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:33:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 063CE1201F2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:33:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k79so6964510ita.2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:33:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3R9BkG5vKynbVM1+NJTHmz6L7ONRJ+KPP8f5UbZAteo=; b=tuREYK2xEk/7uQfYOa7gz5FgqajnOdI8CNYmiVB5W95fxzaLqA7wOXVeGPKYcETRtl lpx+ggW/H/Xd75aPQxfG2HXkKtezRWpP3ibYDjmZ9ucXrS60NqZHY3h+O58C5WlsOKuA CFi3vKZ0tpJ51z2VoqAsmDbQb4zEwmkawBx0twAtYiX/LegbQReKUjP7xLY9iDjqBoW3 un+gmg6jfGZptvlHnhy59ZeXogmWHNYVVrLCsG2vVBCJqkEP1ixobliWbHvgRB+ox19j G7koLh9ZQCM1LxtmkYLMT3id6MNkC3GOKPld0HvCdIM6aPpfROIwVKdxftMvPRnLFPYo reuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3R9BkG5vKynbVM1+NJTHmz6L7ONRJ+KPP8f5UbZAteo=; b=PVOX0aO0ovCIEX4FHi9ac2mLUqRqKRUXetrbv8lyPTKxZcjCKKbIgk9frGzSap0hVV hQoejjVdfT9yNrCxNE0+znysqa+xJLvH8iWnKKndO9z0bT/mZsdoGKBMSop94ZWyvVp/ h4qhhvSIf5fr+qWU1Mz7+1BHaxaCQHf8UEnOW6YVP/Y51DQmxboOSnq4jiOS+i18XzBg j6FR2y9WNTtepx20S3sdWvkpuQVQULE8sJkkL3EXJ8Ni5M0BJ3V45AnM4qP6R5eVeHsr abjEZjiP+tbKy+bwhrDqWy0depdsWkg6v294leqsREuUyexnBJIaeSFyH/iSi83XNXxl e1ZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBVGWI6QU1UYGRq1FTCJs79E0BzoCvdQ0jA51P4Iq2Arn7azYio wabMs35iVPj1R5ZTJHEQUpcbzchHS3WKNZ8qcUg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsmDtL5PL+7h2plFyUhR1XYSzugzueKBK7pZ+H68PAB+chLXxI8NHSPCw7bTjzZmvMTZBhJOxGJpM+ihrzlf7U=
X-Received: by 10.36.222.134 with SMTP id d128mr12205949itg.150.1519630429412; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 02:33:48 -0500
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mikkel_Fahn=C3=B8e_J=C3=B8rgensen?= <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f62726b4-564a-4e45-726b-63705753ddf2@huitema.net>
References: <CAOYVs2q1QSpvZjPRfbJmKhhQ6eApwLSSFSbbOBt2J-PAeqVELQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWuXJb2_BcfU4N=ODwy5JDZKBBd6TyhFmXLbPgVrvCoEA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOYVs2q0q6YrFfipd7UEENoz2ht2Mr0fPqnvy5pJRz-bPxCJpw@mail.gmail.com> <059bc7c6-a8cb-c46b-c971-333b9051c222@huitema.net> <CAOYVs2ogy77tjE+e9_mj6YNYcsDP0iduUKsE-_JnMrOeo4jVbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVLdKiaEDdGKjLXB9wNZ8vxvV_ZyJQnLAR4VxsjUDvjyg@mail.gmail.com> <f62726b4-564a-4e45-726b-63705753ddf2@huitema.net>
X-Mailer: Airmail (420)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 02:33:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN1APdeaFV7-q34Ha2MAO6s7U-=3a_juUOwcw3AD0s7uP7MDcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Unrecoverable loss pattern
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05d0c2ef62fe05661887ee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/WbQe8HMBTmjH4FwUj2a3NlvS20I>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 07:33:51 -0000

> The solution might be to send a "Finished received" frame in the
protected data flow, and require an ACK for that frame. That way, the
problem would really be solved.

That is sort of a handshake of the handshake, but I like the idea.
Could that somehow extend to 0-RTT as a more general concept?