Return-Path: X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17ECC3A0BD7 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:32:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=Odo87gFF; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=uVU7MN9Y Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HyM-Io95BlQ5 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4D9E3A0BEC for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:32:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039195C0090 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 03:32:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 03:32:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm3; bh=5pHaCQxvGhojXeM/IgXYAwz7RhWTNzPlqxRHzikG/H4=; b=Odo87gFF jkfBXcdLkuCGf1EJvmO1lcQdTAwus3P8ga4zoFU84RlW/WU8YTWecxOLj5Opfq7f mXixKytT49vSGjWisPu21CpUYNFoHZPsvW9CKt04kLVTBAU4OPU6ofZ7a4s8RVKh 1sUYfehR8XRd1iZRm/iahidYwUSA3lXYNhmR5dLdGLh0DhCOnOZhPkcypaXQVNWI CiI7T8ATlpTFxzUPHoEa2ad0esmZVJuavQteecyL5m+R8ZmETDLgGLxQv/dyQ5nQ y8i1IVy0qTBPsDC9OVWBvK/FLkomJCu+wWxgvkjfZpKkjGlSU12yMnkxV+dRxJTw bQPmISi+cRdPVQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=5pHaCQxvGhojXeM/IgXYAwz7RhWTN zPlqxRHzikG/H4=; b=uVU7MN9YzvxtGIK2qvBFBQVD7HaOGeUt7M8u/9HpqgAna 7WuLRzleueKCzny8EANxtx4clEX6M0dlZNaZc5fzZWXurwFl+EDeJHxYJFqVmEVH 6VhhRfLWQp9ZtDIz89L8fguBQSQ6tckYZ4meWuGbjXQwh2OTjyzD5pqxsy7PQJRq 5OFiTpE5H1/0NxFYDuVHiJKH2z0QkvUFfAPgus7djFsn5MvjllUshzRZYHlB/DMh sCPgbabQ35/7OYqYdz2b7mBqwhr78STuRurwSkVep9U4DfE/VbN8AicLlSU7tygS rraoOx/llQ5nbNIltgsqRvuHpNqVqHVtKdI26Ed0A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudelhedgvdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejne cuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceu ohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieet necuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphephedvrddvheegrdefrddvvd eknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepugho pghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from fv-az59.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [52.254.3.228]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AA5423067AE1 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 03:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============5843208928432529992==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Repository Activity Summary Bot To: quic@ietf.org Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Message-Id: <20200628073232.AA5423067AE1@mailuser.nyi.internal> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 03:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 07:32:36 -0000 --===============5843208928432529992== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Events without label "editorial" Issues ------ * quicwg/base-drafts (+4/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC10) 4 issues created: - New confidentiality and integrity limits (by chris-wood) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3788=20 - Improve Large Server Certificate Scenario (by nibanks) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3784=20 - Clarify RESET_STREAM interaction with flow-control limits (by jlaine) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3782=20 - Minor inconsistency of error when MAX_STREAMS exceeds 2^60 (by LPardue) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3781=20 6 issues received 10 new comments: - #3784 Improve Large Server Certificate Scenario (4 by janaiyengar, mart= inthomson, nibanks) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3784 [-transport]=20 - #3782 Clarify RESET_STREAM interaction with flow-control limits (1 by m= artinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3782 [-transport]=20 - #3778 Third ECN validation check and lost acknowledgments (1 by martint= homson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3778 [-transport]=20 - #3765 disable_active_migration with SPA (1 by MikeBishop) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3765 [-transport]=20 - #3722 QUIC Transport: Flow Control (2 by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3722 [-transport]=20 - #3690 How to reject a connection attempt (1 by janaiyengar) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3690 [-transport]=20 1 issues closed: - Third ECN validation check and lost acknowledgments https://github.com/= quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3778 [-transport]=20 * quicwg/datagram (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC14) 1 issues created: - question about scope: why only unreliable datagrams? Why not reliable d= atagrams too? (by skissane) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/12=20 2 issues received 14 new comments: - #12 Question about scope: why only unreliable datagrams? Why not reliab= le datagrams too? (4 by DavidSchinazi, Ralith, skissane) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/12=20 - #6 No streams in datagrams? (10 by LPardue, Ralith, martinduke, nibanks= , skissane, tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/6=20 Pull requests ------------- * quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Expand AEAD limits to consider multi-user security. (by chris-wood) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3789=20 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/datagram * https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers * https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation --===============5843208928432529992== Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Sunday June 28, 2020

Events without label "editorial"

Issues

quicwg/base-drafts (+4/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC10)

4 issues created:

6 issues received 10 new comments:

1 issues closed:

quicwg/datagram (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC14)

1 issues created:

2 issues received 14 new comments:

Pull requests

quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0)

1 pull requests submitted:

Repositories tracked by this digest:

--===============5843208928432529992==--