RE: What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution?

Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be> Fri, 08 June 2018 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mbishop@evequefou.be>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C8D130EFE for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 08:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=evequefou.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MyZPT2NY0eko for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0707.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe45::707]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D09A5130EFD for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=evequefou.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-evequefou-be; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HoknuPoiRrYVC68UruxjluGVQ+OnYInU1/V5ZfKOdHM=; b=nX38fEuTUjWXMBkNwgKJf72iJ/Tos2BuUMY2AnCg3CktAJlPNSG6ilQdDe+qtnlwu3Sm55ZU93fKi85YP8oaX77MpRDrIOgRaIcXSXVSqEYfnC0Dokw5XK0gmuj09jqRE1auHkUwqdWHQUr5XR1ccnwJkWOeIE95gehE3HdMLN4=
Received: from BYAPR08MB3944.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (52.135.194.30) by BYAPR08MB4102.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (52.135.195.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.841.14; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:43:43 +0000
Received: from BYAPR08MB3944.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6093:5ef9:46a3:ca1f]) by BYAPR08MB3944.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6093:5ef9:46a3:ca1f%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0841.015; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:43:43 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
To: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution?
Thread-Topic: What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution?
Thread-Index: AQHT/z7wL6rXHN82VkCiLfPXhYFmKKRWgBMQ
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:43:42 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR08MB39443501DF857AFF6DA75E97DA7B0@BYAPR08MB3944.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20180608153916.GC13418@ubuntu-dmitri>
In-Reply-To: <20180608153916.GC13418@ubuntu-dmitri>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=mbishop@evequefou.be;
x-originating-ip: [12.130.119.130]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BYAPR08MB4102; 7:AgkxHmea1Pu6fdzsRBdJ4CK6UG/AzoDJMqznUk/wn3WHtXZJQq3evRkjbDRQdE4eacOA8KwjekuqYZE0R/zJZ7ERfMfRqpDUCpd2zjnq3v1qstSyxGgGBlK/UWbKKxiqktlszO5rL4V1Cl7kl2FM45cMB4sgBYqZQeNG9qpCPYFOrFJB0+2BFwTjFIchw8UU5TpkQVmsK9cRu3SE+oiKZ00QJQlzfg2ACz+RbS1R9SNfgAhKJ/Q5GfWZaAM0M7ll
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(7021125)(5600026)(4534165)(7022125)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7028125)(7023125)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR08MB4102;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR08MB4102:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR08MB41020D4A0491CD93E7955EE7DA7B0@BYAPR08MB4102.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(211936372134217)(119230021023882);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(2016111802025)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BYAPR08MB4102; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BYAPR08MB4102;
x-forefront-prvs: 06973FFAD3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(346002)(39380400002)(376002)(366004)(39830400003)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(6436002)(5250100002)(33656002)(106356001)(55016002)(105586002)(66066001)(97736004)(5660300001)(229853002)(2900100001)(68736007)(3846002)(6116002)(102836004)(8936002)(2906002)(11346002)(110136005)(81156014)(81166006)(6246003)(186003)(14454004)(26005)(7736002)(305945005)(76176011)(7696005)(74316002)(410100003)(25786009)(53546011)(486006)(316002)(6506007)(476003)(561944003)(8676002)(446003)(575784001)(478600001)(86362001)(3660700001)(3280700002)(966005)(99286004)(53936002)(6306002)(9686003)(74482002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR08MB4102; H:BYAPR08MB3944.namprd08.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: evequefou.be does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 8vxqOn6XHCWjeOgBqr/x32YZ5+YrvMyT2hHiuUsbeWlo5nRqoh3UDcVFuB6D/IaaB3NK+OSC3PpO7+ssi8LmC3l89M5q8vqpeYQHRVfh9uxjD0iZTAGHRvQhLMlJ9B991twwm5+lE+h9I8sktzClfZcYOvYc4ngEOAHPylOC4osEcbsymhNJ8LqPkKrC5+Uv
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 1c6dd57a-a592-4ad1-554b-08d5cd569d3a
X-OriginatorOrg: evequefou.be
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1c6dd57a-a592-4ad1-554b-08d5cd569d3a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Jun 2018 15:43:42.9459 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 41eaf50b-882d-47eb-8c4c-0b5b76a9da8f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR08MB4102
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/XcjyFoKJeCGDzUEvETHSjJhDLFY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 15:43:48 -0000

It wasn't a resolution, just a discussion -- Martin presented the work he's been doing and asked for people interested in working with him to get in touch.

-----Original Message-----
From: QUIC <quic-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dmitri Tikhonov
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 9:39 AM
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution?

All,

What was the WG resolution with regard to the QUIC Load Balancers proposal?  I failed to grasp the outcome of the discussion and the minutes [1] do not have it.

Thanks,

  - Dmitri.

1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-2aBorKh9WVE3jM5mBlYNliJH0Ef_gp3dJo0RBe9y4c/edit#heading=h.jlkx7yo7rr9h