IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Add extension work to Interop matrix

Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FA13A1459 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:50:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gxe-otcvjdT0 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E585E3A142C for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id e16so945518qkl.6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:50:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/8Z24kA7HAywWfSUdJUmsSmTH6kP08NNk3wYzpsyR4E=; b=nY/gUanswOhgobVZh+0w2m5fn7dQS22JfgzBpuzVBD9JqGA/QMhMkr15AW1GJ8PFOl 35hwUkv+ylPdJBM0Nl7hnMqvIvbcs3dxsDgBGwj4j599NCqWsuF09pKs91mj2I+ZEaSq 9slKvloOuQxkLntd1Q1aDyMl0bnnK84VdyrdarkBzuBlZcae3m+6s2jEvOjo3z0ZorBM tJoXU/QmtkVbL0slqMv47zvQdwcgF1EE5Ep7faBaWmsJyAUpJ7I0pn+Z5wcFBE2EBE3Y bz94CbmHyf5l5JPuDrQVWUUPywmpyPClgC3BT56H6e8g+ziD+i66SqcVD7rZp9HvxwRY 6RNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/8Z24kA7HAywWfSUdJUmsSmTH6kP08NNk3wYzpsyR4E=; b=WJJDafgfzk5DOwT5j00cVqOK6r5zEtty3kMiX7i3ZeIH+lYEeAdFWczt/62tv8Ggd3 79sRL0amgNZ1RV4u0FqXZNxByhhMw/t6ZZo7o/hFX6T6ib+gDz8SShvRKNLAXrJD6T6m 6RH0wTr3+ssh9tLDrYDIg9vuKSion7dRal3XdVPNrOcDzEbGHthVyN6Yb1Y7+qBjc164 PfrwNbmnA2iywP3mWDvca/krtjrGIXGh3fcrpv1qaXFTFUV2E5KDPgVGETUFDvhLhEc1 hWwLiC9PU4wXNLWOR+5nvGDwXAFM/+9BKFgn+usuTszynzWdeVBfB5ExfWRLQOBOzXc1 xk+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVtsylHf3BYgZ7IkJ3afWOr+/k3l0LF9l+74GM2cGGM6XUaBpGh OY6tt6rq9ZmCbJ45XG19h0KQJg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyu8aK1kpAL3ZLCxUCZ+PBTDexzzsAfxGm3wBitX98QP001XlVPexLbzFH6renr/VNVSM78Nw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:21d5:: with SMTP id h21mr1302112qka.2.1582750216973; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:50:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ubuntu-dmitri (ool-2f1636b6.static.optonline.net. [47.22.54.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 64sm1769736qkd.78.2020.02.26.12.50.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:50:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:50:12 -0500
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Add extension work to Interop matrix
Message-ID: <20200226205011.GA17953@ubuntu-dmitri>
Mail-Followup-To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
References: <20200107143114.GC14229@ubuntu-dmitri> <A8ADA573-F937-4675-8080-9DC442958EBF@eggert.org> <CALGR9obkU-ogbfSFyQbAzgvPBQoezYbUvG9ZS-0NofKM7Qzv=g@mail.gmail.com> <5242d630-d923-311e-35c9-94f854b0c929@huitema.net> <CALGR9oahe3U5dtwJnD-2FS60=fZSC7KPX15nrJ4DcAebo4hV1Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oahe3U5dtwJnD-2FS60=fZSC7KPX15nrJ4DcAebo4hV1Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/YocLQrwcGxsXoOVXAF8bjMu38Hs>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:50:23 -0000

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:27:03PM +0000, Lucas Pardue wrote:
> That said, I have some stake in the DATAGRAM tests. d for DATAGRAM sounds
> good to me.

I proposed 'g' earlier in this thread.  This way, the letters from
the two interop matrices have no conflicts ('d' is for QPACK dynamic
table).

Of course, true to my creed, I won't die on this hill (or any other
hill).

  - Dmitri.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email