Re: Consensus call for two multipath QUIC issues
Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com> Fri, 21 June 2024 18:16 UTC
Return-Path: <lucas@lucaspardue.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58ECFC14F6B2; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lucaspardue.com header.b="Z+IEwEXu"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="Cvout32/"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UO2GUDFTP2xw; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BD3C14F696; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C111800093; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:16:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap53 ([10.202.2.103]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:16:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lucaspardue.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1718993773; x= 1719080173; bh=zsV56Eey3qEzxH8T3JWzX5bbppVegsV5rwKpwsQfc0Q=; b=Z +IEwEXuwIsr8InMKGuFE9ilvzKl3KYXSh3tGpXbjPAXZCSP/ysi6+GWSrLVvObRf Tf4riohWc/dvzNlktjw0luMb0UqwYx+q3tTrucsNHwCl9CkCrCauPq4ZEklObJaM pZ9dxbZHGO8D9w16D3LmuNMLt+iH0bTelwouXXQOsj/6k8HbWHxpmGyXJm7f+kpg PzgTR45NeA0XkN9eZnFJwPUQNwnME+bIJrksCNVZuMkD1J+aT6Vnzx1DHwrLb41M Rs4ehlZj5wsy4kwlGvGHS7G4q0u+MWo6vUsLyiF2O9b0rNtCrjzNkjjxwBlNbtCy GKdbqq/l/oF1uAjeVruhQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1718993773; x=1719080173; bh=zsV56Eey3qEzxH8T3JWzX5bbppVe gsV5rwKpwsQfc0Q=; b=Cvout32/6Ck7xBz6H7MH2cAh9lqK9cJSUImVEq+lHBNf N1nOthDbDLAZO/fAGaF6ETmGKSyEaGwGMW7vKzIXhdA9KIoAW71mYI9OeYwHprCb 7RTFsCC6ByZkpgKuvb7DL7JF+BIIUpBwoojKqoH/E5ryhzxpeF0wPAitoN2yQryx JQi3s6A3IUlEQARXrXqYx5Q4sJwTS7IC9NrpgdMLvmlF/XdZoNN5nas/uv7CCV9S T4hyUEHc4AtWsgVdyHCUeco5aPKJyNlj2KnxTxfxz71FFtl7o6JbfE7v4VMfsVY/ 4GkFCDANgL4w1SAE/tXZAUKTzdpnMDgLl03VZ1zyoA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:bcN1ZmnquRfpA81rHyxweZXHlDc6ppHVXDoWcQJ5f6pkXd9A2impfg> <xme:bcN1Zt1AhZF9V30clZhoerS25G8rI3tzH6ioN-jPikjmU4cS51C-zkhc1rhcLx2SM YSHN7HjMwIy9B22Los>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfeefgedguddvgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesrgdtreerreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfn uhgtrghsucfrrghrughuvgdfuceolhhutggrsheslhhutggrshhprghrughuvgdrtghomh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepuefhteegteehleevkeevteeihfdvvdelgeefffekueeu leefgfdvfefftdduleevnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehluhgtrghssehluhgt rghsphgrrhguuhgvrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:bcN1ZkqEHxchiHYVzSj5YyeSXf7TTB1BOCHi_Sh-ZrwTEZdwsy-Z0g> <xmx:bcN1Zqk7YY5WogQprn6Yk9LA4bPSb-FOGcZ3fhABE0PRp8QwyRHsZg> <xmx:bcN1Zk0BEMVVKkxFUER-8luRed6oAVrYzDocIkKWJ-vZnH3zjOJMEA> <xmx:bcN1ZhtY3sLNJechxRWLeWRvRN6uhZFhvpJspWFpyMG3FpihOCuBBQ> <xmx:bcN1Zh-zWnCEhdwRXy4Y956ivdw1IOD_UMBvppVeAv4dueBCabj3_2uP>
Feedback-ID: i23b94938:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7C36B3640070; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:16:13 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-522-ga39cca1d5-fm-20240610.002-ga39cca1d
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <c6b6f7e2-4c2a-4e32-a6a7-7aa5b66004cc@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <80f71b32-6e80-4406-b33e-03b54b31a1bb@app.fastmail.com>
References: <80f71b32-6e80-4406-b33e-03b54b31a1bb@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 19:15:53 +0100
From: Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Consensus call for two multipath QUIC issues
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2e8945faf1f741ee99ff3105be32f77e"
Message-ID-Hash: EHQ377GYO54FHPEMS42DD3JPOXO2PDXH
X-Message-ID-Hash: EHQ377GYO54FHPEMS42DD3JPOXO2PDXH
X-MailFrom: lucas@lucaspardue.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-quic.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: QUIC WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/_PGlhb2DqImPFu7CJ-xmXtTISZQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:quic-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:quic-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:quic-leave@ietf.org>
Hearing no responses either here or on GitHub, consensus was declared and the changes incorporated into the latest document revision. Cheers Lucas On Wed, Jun 5, 2024, at 15:47, Lucas Pardue wrote: > Hi all, > > During the interim meeting this week, there appeared to be emerging consensus on two open issues: > > * Designing odd/even path-id, or not - https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/328 > * Should active_connection_id_limit ve per path or per connection? - https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/332 > > This email starts a 1 week consensus call to close both of these issues with no action - ending on 2024-06-12 anywhere on earth. If you have comments on either issue, please direct it to GitHub. > > Cheers > Lucas & Matt > QUIC WG Chairs
- Consensus call for two multipath QUIC issues Lucas Pardue
- Re: Consensus call for two multipath QUIC issues Lucas Pardue