Resolution of design issues identified during IESG Review

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 13 January 2021 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164B93A0A12; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:32:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JDVwij0ZoxKd; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 459383A0A02; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:90c2:2c38:bc3c:adb6] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:90c2:2c38:bc3c:adb6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD249600079; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:32:36 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1610530357; bh=FzZ9oOtdBkF13Wqj/HxYn0vV9bZjpJ5UcFUaG5DEpc8=; h=From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Cc:To; b=ejAPHC9r7B28DeGIwtA7gfzMpVdo7LCClpoIz6GJ+3WCUIDZV+dTWn4Rua7kzCiwV d+GvzHvpgqUxdptzULOCwDQ5x9tX02mqX8AUy50hTiIKT47dNcWg2VC+1lWHgmdies eZ/YfqXYQa2n/0Kw9he/s6u7yIsE5kHUsCikkiXQ=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1DB581ED-7427-4F09-A4B6-D92BD44A9AEB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Reply-To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Subject: Resolution of design issues identified during IESG Review
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:32:35 +0200
Message-Id: <C3E1321A-D279-4C48-994A-44D7365EADF8@eggert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
X-MailScanner-ID: CD249600079.A1637
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/_ajOXpUFDKz2s246fNoh7FEKEPk>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:32:47 -0000

Hi,

in response to the IESG Review of the QUIC transport, tls, recovery and invariants documents, individual GitHub issues were opened and the documents moved to the "Revised I-D Needed" state. (The HTTP/3 and QPACK IESG reviews will happen at a later date.)

The editors have been hard at work triaging and responding to the issues. Thanks to a concerted effort, most of the issues have already been resolved. Some were deemed to require no action and have been closed, some were Editorial issues that have been addressed by PRs that have been merged into the working copies. The remaining issues have been identified as Design issues, see https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Adesign+-label%3Acall-issued

As previously mentioned, we are boosting the visibility of these Design issues in order to allow the WG and the IESG to comment on the proposed resolutions:

* Martin Duke Transport Comment 2 - https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4453
  The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4696

* Robert Wilton Invariants Discuss 1 - https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4468
  The proposed resolution is to close with no action.

* Ben Kaduk's TLS Discuss 1 - https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4475
  The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4689

* Ben Kaduk's TLS Comment 9 - https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4485
  The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4570#

* Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 2 - https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4525
  The proposed resolution is to close with no action.

* Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 4 - https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4527
  The proposed resolution is to close with no action.

* Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 13 - https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4536
  The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4471

The editors are ready to land the proposed resolutions and release version -34 of transport, tls, recovery and invariants documents so that we can present them back to the IESG so that the remaining DISCUSSes can be formally lifted.

Rather than issuing a WG consensus call for the above design issues, we plan to action the proposed resolutions, mark the issues as "call-issued" and leave them open until the IESG confirms that it is happy, in order for further comments to accumulate.

Cheers
Lars & Lucas
QUIC WG Co-chairs