From nobody Wed Jan 27 12:23:09 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41183A00C9 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:23:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFSkhLv5TMNz for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:23:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E72F3A005F for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:23:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id 84so3299246yba.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:23:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+hS2FjmNQTiJUlqO+Ol73fz7rKVOJ0ixiwj7BHk+qCA=; b=k+UzTTVD36w9sXNwoU7FobdJmT/G508neRMms/lpWk+++BJ7BRz+79sMjE3QB93PHG LH1BR0q47oHhXFe/OMRTAA0diby8satYV8IzAQOUVlb6EZ0f5fEmFY39GggafiR1Y6SV 9cTOQC4lHtWbaBU4sCEd5x3SMCPH7clFwkOOlo1G0F3+bWf9ZOZgvOykmWnKMc9dg23q bv3X7XoL0stNeK7eBHpV+1k9L/55w9xQisVxSujOycT9WLV3pAWivjz6YdpHnmwnWNrb /ND0eaQfB9uPxxx0XPin71SkLY6KT/QXVi+zjfvs3q4njHbi+/OT6GoX3qEjUswTwdDn eBTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+hS2FjmNQTiJUlqO+Ol73fz7rKVOJ0ixiwj7BHk+qCA=; b=MlAWslUkk5FCDTT0O6avEdGyqvGP7PRxGQky2hXlMk1LZ/4Pzbw5QjZyFDiTrjTm5H obS+kwL499GThcxx4Uv7nHfLK/7YVo2DKJ/E51GqOOi+iYZiX7qMPFx/P2ea0lh6sipc fn8jd9F1QqyoQfsaVlEGNa0sEH0Jas2Jux9l+92DXi8Mk/XySSk+eGQPq2LcX2C7g+g1 Ds2472VQ1uoQcPbskZLkzqFE4OdASq2dYj7JKwEc0wJ9tnLTYlV7i6+pR9H+Z5ZGJjIa yVTcONG76raCWHLcMBQ5FDAEwvv4Ul0UZUkdtARDzwhTGJDauocDS1LDxXUwDgmOvP05 xqHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531y16fJ62DtCJ8DeW6eySIQVRvUSgUJ7LYY+NeaUZEs3xGXWBrh elcOhK2AHtBMlJ8/h6IkclN1faVV580ylgXN4CzyOJ7H X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxuXLN53SBRNyyu9JIvd3VmWa0RkJRVXiTgpBLDojkAWlnGST4sCh9zvvqzxvb6V7Lh98uOi2832OMRvqnxIg= X-Received: by 2002:a25:8146:: with SMTP id j6mr18660434ybm.380.1611778985254; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:23:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:22:39 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Agenda items for IETF 110 To: Matt Joras Cc: IETF QUIC WG Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000df63dc05b9e78975" Archived-At: X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:23:08 -0000 --000000000000df63dc05b9e78975 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear Chairs, On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:54 PM Matt Joras wrote: > Hi, > > It is time to start thinking about the agenda for IETF 110. If you have > topics you would like to discuss please start preparing materials and send > agenda requests either as a PR against the agenda file > > (preferred) or by email to quic-chairs@ietf.org. As always the chairs > will work on prioritizing WG items and the as time permits portions. > We talked about another possible QUIC interim meeting on multipath, when proponents made enough progress to justify that. I don't know that we've made enough progress to ask for schedule time at IETF 110, especially if the chairs need time for anything left over from QUICv1 balloting and rechartering, but I hope we can talk about multipath before IETF 111, if progress justifies that. (And multipath proponents are welcome to tell us about progress that hasn't made it to the datatracker or mailing list yet!) Best, Spencer --000000000000df63dc05b9e78975 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Chairs,=C2=A0

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at= 2:54 PM Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

It is time to start thinking about the agenda for IETF 110. If you have top= ics you would like to discuss please start preparing materials and send agenda requests either as a PR against the agenda file (preferred) or by email to quic-chairs@ietf.org<= /a>. As always the chairs will work on prioritizing WG items and the as tim= e permits portions.




--000000000000df63dc05b9e78975--