Re: Multipath Milestones

Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 16 February 2018 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660AD1201FA for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:53:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0bVcNIKu5KvN for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20559126C22 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id b21so397680wme.4 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:53:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nOPgcZqlAei0I3Mm8SGPH3nM8mOOUPqKStXry2jRt44=; b=hp3IsC8Xw6Ncko9UaIAI4CxGRYePtXObsGQQMM1+nQlj0wdCNEH892eIwyuk/8DOwJ L45BmUGguLcAv3hNWA1Q+j219sqA3GWwA0YuqfCYmp58naYDNV7YYCWT63ApvTiUipzl MdqhdT2cJLPTN//p5mHMPzC2EKjDwSbtpy3X3t+biELb58UtYozcIUNdaANMtDg6rYqa 30ir5OkjkuxZBpOp+oB6t0wdTrfx9ApGXHoTw4X4mVMvL7uvxbvufdknb0DW/HlCCy/T XgIMLhGklqQ+O3zlSBKswSMp9qK+SsiqTC4kYHYLeAKE+vpr1bk+ycaQvZMvY16z3YTJ 5hcw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nOPgcZqlAei0I3Mm8SGPH3nM8mOOUPqKStXry2jRt44=; b=A4MFDqFEU+Y7/uPMVRBQvDPZAOwHg5cMVWwHXn5ivOYuv/M/dN3CVN2vzUHpRbdSdV pwTdTv2VPM5jMLuydBXmMikTJSUN93+gLIqJdDaUK4azsPh4GrOqy6o0JINIZIRhd7Ek rxbpqeBoiF0rYNE1GBljD/hba+5fLQjkGwh1bgqXlkoytvzPz8IZZ0rGHv9jkZwcShUR 3B2JKIH3KAnvSfXnLApjITO9piebLkU/g+xVp6gQ16KTjyKNBDdCHwj6SyHT4KQit2xo ZN9hBi6kbnqh42gUd8ll+TxpZ0xbOAYercQTRGzggq8m2jPfCvxfb18/ruM8HBa/klAZ 4Oqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBFcrni1ijjatnj50ViQikPPQZijWRmnNhvHWVRBrYdBK7UOres k9PEp5jMdheTAMkGUZFdzTUyB23KMVZ6ptQfJixbBQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224TndbfYU0HSAtAa/7O/n2hcq+BqiOYNXUzyxXDxiw9fC5sN1HhqaCfYohU7mFUt9oThSdqWJRCUvOPrw1Yj3M=
X-Received: by 10.28.124.8 with SMTP id x8mr273062wmc.147.1518742393685; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:53:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.195.139 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:53:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUOXrD3iAftmvWe6TVhukCOCNLrLw7DfyfafHe3PocPOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BAE0BEA@bgb01xud1012> <DE0B9AF2-915C-42A0-85E4-C419782D46B5@netapp.com> <CAKcm_gO4gc-iek4_VKi+ekyUyWTQ0Pt-wmr=zvXdGezzXDBiNA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGD1bZZgx4O54vFO-O1ZHsWbzYuOp4ne4d33HCd67f8K7coPEQ@mail.gmail.com> <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BAE0D46@bgb01xud1012> <F7721A5C-A8E0-4AB2-BD4C-F36C6531D3FE@netapp.com> <CACpbDccMMxyy-NrN0Uc4g+4=e1KoFuDTCzOVPkwfbMmX8V=9tA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUOXrD3iAftmvWe6TVhukCOCNLrLw7DfyfafHe3PocPOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:53:13 -0800
Message-ID: <CACpbDcdHoSsrdENrrJK6-0_YtF2o-09CPZGUf6FJsVw43v0paA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Multipath Milestones
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082d00f8e18d5b056549c493"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/asf8_-RNPzuwNXLxL6AnATmz4SY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:53:17 -0000

I agree with all that, except multipath is > v1, and it is on the list of
milestones. I'd be in favor of removing it entirely from the list of
milestones.

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I don't have a lot of interest in spending too much time on procedural
> issues.  An unrealistic milestone is only a problem if you think that
> it is.  I'm more interested in executing on the plan (shipping).
>
> Let's talk about v2 when it is time to work on v2.  I'm aware that
> this might be very soon after v1, but I think that talking v2 in
> London might be a little premature.
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Depends on what v2 is. I'd like to ship some v2 by then, but that may not
> > include multipath... that's a conversation we need to have with more
> details
> > about strategy and so on. This is perhaps a can of worms to open in
> London?
> >
> > As I remember it, multipath was on the charter because we wanted to
> signal
> > that we were going to work on it, just not yet. If we are agreed on
> doing it
> > after v1, I wonder if it makes most sense now to simply remove it from
> the
> > charter and re-litigate it when we create a charter for post-v1 work.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:08 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2018-2-14, at 22:42, Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> From my own perspective, changing milestone dates to <TBD>, <suspended
> >> until further notice> etc would give a more honest reflection of current
> >> status. Not sure if the datatracker allows such a thing.
> >>
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, it doesn't. It needs a date, I can delete a milestone, or
> >> mark as completed.
> >>
> >> My suggestion would be to move the "adoption" milestone to Nov 2018, and
> >> the completion milestone to July 2019. Do people think we can ship v2 by
> >> then?
> >>
> >> Lars
> >
> >
>