Re: Big changes in -17

<> Mon, 29 October 2018 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAF7130E1D for <>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 06:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.291
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.291 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwYhLMNvFb_C for <>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 06:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CDB71293FB for <>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 06:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown [xx.xx.xx.68]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 42kFjk3lCcz5vsC; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:26:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.3]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 42kFjk50csz1xpG; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:26:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [] ( by OPEXCLILM5D.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:26:18 +0100
Subject: Re: Big changes in -17
To: Martin Thomson <>, QUIC WG <>
References: <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:26:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr-xx-moderne
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: []
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:26:21 -0000

Hello Martin,

On 10/26/2018 01:20 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> 4. The first octet.  We discussed this in NY:
> and we will have a decision about the spin bit within 2 weeks.  After
> that, one of the designs discussed will be implemented.

Do I assume correctly that "the designs discussed" are the following three:

  - nothing (no spin bit)
  - spin bit alone
  - spin bit + VEC

Or is there room for other (written) proposals ?


Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.