Re: Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 00:21 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8B2132AE4 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rsCYTb4AOvlo for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BAD3132AD9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id o196so11154866ioe.0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O/4F5JbMZRbJ4hfeOEWxHHraJssfBfZ1Hn8yJWqPgfU=; b=LYO30YBn6iOSa+USRfK8dJ4rj0cR9fOXu86c3Uh76ZGGED9Dqe6UkQKHCYjG79lHYN FK4nPBtF0V7uv271qeDX6IFQbvWlJcgRiWN9kOpRLVO843pxwF35Ll0tPSTIwuhIT9wJ wpAhCkgsRnKBpwAFbuaOnd7beqfpE0LKlJThtY45laAgO4LFLBoiD3yVqHG/TDi1Kye+ IL+WvhOWEGNz5EVFmRtKC9uayT0IN6bkpRwgEZJDceVnyvMF2U76d5QXIh3+lByFkStJ 0N2OKR3dNfusG5kMhamynLqS795mLMPR3i8P87teTjDn6RNfXTh4yD/neeWU2grXqSAw whgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O/4F5JbMZRbJ4hfeOEWxHHraJssfBfZ1Hn8yJWqPgfU=; b=OGb5PGsI2sPGUEbT5KtNhgpU9EiHfAHToP8l3IA4QEKAfXKLzuyoM5fCQRZ2xYpQ00 VBStisYZhzEblMxRlEUldlkhh/dHSwt8ABALV6INWJhs8uN11rvWLlk11GNG97eJ9U1d On0uCqg7qC/oEUOzYp4bRZqdrvVTjyfYkISj1gFVAnvBL3EYdcrXEqFf9HvHxJaA4H2c G7x1/LxLYykN6ShZBDpte3FOJQC2wPvGwYSGsnZ9gExDcN/eU9/cgSlWKNpAnV3MZClC ni7ZNllaNKcnzw9oyMboDPyZXhDsqdOQVn7GaLxY4PKMNEiVeECGx6UL9yOoU27lyf+J AYZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jG9QxKeReh67mYpCxAwpbpR3VIrtQv9Ly322DkgiU0WPPitodI VcS9QtANuRYqjXGBHSeJDgGa27APWTCC
X-Received: by 10.107.9.203 with SMTP id 72mr10145409ioj.72.1503361276396; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.133.37 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B66C97F6-B311-4D0C-A746-0F6D75DDA1A8@netapp.com>
References: <8BDD717E-76DE-4C58-A242-C24DFFADEA8E@netapp.com> <CABkgnnXgENPEYwJHS8KAvquC98jhzx6goDOqbDjh5vsvG6_u7g@mail.gmail.com> <B66C97F6-B311-4D0C-A746-0F6D75DDA1A8@netapp.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:21:15 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVOftiSiDNOgcZmwhi1XaWR1unHayW0BCWJBugrDtauWA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/bMJXCPg3xLTMzS4EsYI3jUBdVwc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:21:19 -0000
On 22 August 2017 at 10:13, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote: > On 2017-8-21, at 17:06, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: >> Clearly the authors didn't understand why RSA was chosen by Google. > > I asked whether they had thoughts on whether their results might be influenced by QUIC-Crypto and if IETF-QUIC might perform differently... ECDSA might produce entirely different results here. The computation effort is largely dominated by the cost of the signature. That is assuming that they used x25519 for key exchange, which is pretty close to zero cost in comparison to RSA.
- Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server Eggert, Lars
- Re: Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server Martin Thomson
- Re: Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server Eggert, Lars
- Re: Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server Martin Thomson
- Re: Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server Eric Rescorla