Re: Consensus Calls for Transport/TLS issues, pre-Singapore

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

Consensus declared for all *except* #3014; we'll continue to discuss that.

Cheers,


> On 14 Nov 2019, at 12:25 pm, Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them late next week. Note that by default we won't discuss these issues in Singapore, unless something comes up.
> 
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
> 
> * #3127: NEW_TOKEN and Retry tokens must be distinguishable
>  Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3128
> 
> * #3158: Application close should be disallowed in Initial or Handshake
>  Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3164
> 
> * #3155: The method of identifying "the same server"
>  Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3156
> 
> * #2475: Invalid CONNECTION_CLOSE frames
>  Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3231
> 
> * #3168: Allow servers to close connections immediately when the token is corrupted
>  Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3107
> 
> * #3194: reordered NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames with retired sequence numbers shouldn't be used
>  Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3202
> 
> * #3014: Handling of corrupt Retry packets
>  Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120
> 
> * #3095: Backoff of CONNECTION_CLOSE needs to be a MUST
>  Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3157
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/