I've just read QUIC Manageability-09 with a slightly critical view to see where more clarity might be useful.

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Thu, 04 February 2021 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E94C3A133B for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 04:13:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kb_w4dMN1jCl for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 04:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314823A133A for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 04:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from GF-MacBook-Pro.lan (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49FBE1B0010F for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:13:23 +0000 (GMT)
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Subject: I've just read QUIC Manageability-09 with a slightly critical view to see where more clarity might be useful.
Message-ID: <08eae648-174c-3f63-5a2e-cbfd0194f35b@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:13:22 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2F075C06130768A8A0FE9C27"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/bsbT4GqMcaZNovRKc1ejcX7GVF0>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:13:31 -0000

My review was divided into some NiTs - which I assumed were editorial 
(issues might be needed if they are more than editorial), and a series 
of issues - mainly asking for clarification.

Gorry


This issue contains a set of editorial NiTs from QUIC Manageability-09 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/185>
#185 opened10 minutes agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
Sect 4.8: Reducing the timeout on UDP NATs 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/184>
#184 opened13 minutes agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
Sect 4.1 : what is the recommendation for middleboxes/NATs? 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/183>
#183 opened14 minutes agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
Sect 4.6: emphatically NOT RECOMMENDED use of ACK mitigation? 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/182>
#182 opened18 minutes agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
Sect 4.7: Also an MF-Classifier for QoS? 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/181>
#181 opened20 minutes agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
Sect 3.7.2 on spinning to understand the RTT 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/180>
#180 opened29 minutes agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
Sect 3.7.2 : Is the spinning of bits invariant or for the current QUIC 
Spec? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/179>
#179 opened32 minutes agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
Sect 2.7: Telling middleboxes to ignore version? 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/178>
#178 opened34 minutes agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
Sect 2.4: MTU or Min QUIC Packet Size? 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/177>
#177 opened44 minutes agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
Section 2.3 - QUIC Port Numbers (not really different to other ports) 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/176>
#176 opened1 hour agobygorryfair 
<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>