IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Call for Adoption: Invariants

Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be> Mon, 05 February 2018 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mbishop@evequefou.be>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0281E12D945 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:00:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=evequefou.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z9Fl1Xkbblbl for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0126.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2425F12D944 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:00:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=evequefou.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-evequefou-be; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=UZ0CcwpYYdslt44/qEajzn1AS04BSQ87iDMEFXw2uZ8=; b=KxobcFEhGeia5RHBsw+xSAGSqL7eZTkR861zxeG51yVDdw0nmsgA1w8BYH26Q5L9SafKBOImbgBcMi4XvmXV6m38W0rahG+RIvxKRHZuGL5Lm6TjHI06rw5wAOLIkhRLHBQcfADjpDor4kHEKIV8vK17Os8jKuFjtUdGsNOUVIQ=
Received: from MWHPR08MB2432.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.169.203.136) by MWHPR08MB2509.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.173.230.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.464.11; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:00:53 +0000
Received: from MWHPR08MB2432.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.169.203.136]) by MWHPR08MB2432.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.169.203.136]) with mapi id 15.20.0464.015; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:00:53 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
To: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
CC: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Call for Adoption: Invariants
Thread-Topic: Call for Adoption: Invariants
Thread-Index: AQHTnkeuZnxZRuZmRE2jEtXr4M5toqOVb7kAgAALu4CAAK8BAA==
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:00:53 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR08MB2432F1CB1FBAFACD611D3913DAFE0@MWHPR08MB2432.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <C35C3AB6-F0FC-4D83-9C97-DD0B605A863F@mnot.net> <DB6PR10MB17667AAB19D4A9288FD5BAF3ACFE0@DB6PR10MB1766.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <FDFA0988-1FB4-4AFC-8958-1A6B16068FE5@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <FDFA0988-1FB4-4AFC-8958-1A6B16068FE5@trammell.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=mbishop@evequefou.be;
x-originating-ip: [38.134.241.6]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR08MB2509; 7:t/bBDXDoJt27ZmtaP+Q8Xn7GComZtB+/U7KFL2vviPOIjHUuzBwQ4O/YCG/s60fXCc2fCwBiyBUcsFbS9GJygTZlcBTRrxui1frTjb6I0faRU7yjy2b/sBmjvO16k8XWMyh8RvQ6leMcQF8ugtEW3wC+qkUyQwEFkF+Bg50NDNiaV3NTgphywnYnHI2+E6mJHTl9bFjKJNIDLpx2SVsxWyqQLpxEXidPj3WHvBC6mchmOKPKLqgOF9RCqrPdAzH0
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bcbcba4b-10cf-4a72-3f9b-08d56ccac7e5
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(7021125)(4534165)(7022125)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7028125)(7023125)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR08MB2509;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR08MB2509:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR08MB2509F80C2EBBBB813FA3EAA4DAFE0@MWHPR08MB2509.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(85827821059158);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231101)(2400082)(944501161)(93006095)(93001095)(6041288)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(2016111802025)(20161123562045)(6072148)(6043046)(201708071742011); SRVR:MWHPR08MB2509; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:MWHPR08MB2509;
x-forefront-prvs: 0574D4712B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(366004)(376002)(346002)(39380400002)(396003)(39830400003)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(33656002)(2900100001)(2950100002)(2906002)(81156014)(6506007)(25786009)(8676002)(53546011)(478600001)(229853002)(81166006)(102836004)(8936002)(3846002)(6116002)(5660300001)(76176011)(68736007)(74316002)(74482002)(186003)(7696005)(105586002)(54906003)(305945005)(7736002)(110136005)(77096007)(39060400002)(97736004)(26005)(14454004)(966005)(4326008)(53936002)(86362001)(55016002)(3660700001)(3280700002)(6436002)(9686003)(6306002)(99286004)(66066001)(6246003)(316002)(106356001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR08MB2509; H:MWHPR08MB2432.namprd08.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: evequefou.be does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: y51bKL64iTQgfplAGgx8AsfC6pA+cIpoLgoKBVgZcKMhxPQd5bR2q4LdFBT75I4FIi2l8Smp9lK9ltTtvJOzDw==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: evequefou.be
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bcbcba4b-10cf-4a72-3f9b-08d56ccac7e5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Feb 2018 19:00:53.3489 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 41eaf50b-882d-47eb-8c4c-0b5b76a9da8f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR08MB2509
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/cIPRM2rmgw8NK2fcovaT3Uc4KvI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:00:58 -0000

I support adoption.  The way to change the invariants will be to mint a new protocol, and not claim that your new protocol is a version of QUIC.  If it happens to be startlingly similar, all well and good.

-----Original Message-----
From: QUIC [mailto:quic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Trammell (IETF)
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 12:34 AM
To: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>; Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Invariants

Hi, all,

I support adoption of the invariants draft.

> On 5 Feb 2018, at 08:51, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Only concern is when it takes effect since it likely needs adjustments.

I'd presume that invariants is published simultaneously with the version 1 spec.

> And perhaps a procedure to handle invariant changes since everything changes.

Noted, though the point of declaring something an invariant is to say "the meaning of this part of the wire image, expressed as a bit offset, will never change". You can add constraints to the invariants, but if you think you might remove a constraint, then it's not an invariant by definition.

Cheers,

Brian

> From: QUIC <quic-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 7:07:45 AM
> To: QUIC WG
> Cc: Lars Eggert
> Subject: Call for Adoption: Invariants
> 
> At the Melbourne meeting, there was strong support for adopting Martin's invariants draft:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-quic-invariants-00
> 
> Any objections / concerns about doing so? Unless we hear otherwise, we'll adopt at the end of the week.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email