Re: Second WGLC for Multipath Extension for QUIC

[Ian Swett <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the reminder.  I remember us having a longish discussion about
whether this should be standards track or not.  I still don't feel like
it's ready for standards track, but I realize it's a somewhat arbitrary
distinction.  I don't think Multipath QUIC is 'done', but rather is a v1
prototype. That's not to say we shouldn't ship it and get more information
(See gQUIC, BBR, and many other projects I've been involved in).

Thanks, Ian

On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 12:08 PM Lucas Pardue <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Gentle reminder, the WGLC is running for another couple of days if you
> have any comments to make, including comments for or against this document
> progressing to publication.
>
> Cheers
> Lucas & Matt
> QUIC WG Chairs
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025, at 20:53, Lucas Pardue wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Following from the first WGLC [1], the document has been revised to
> address feedback.
>
> This email announces a second WGLC for the Multipath Extension for QUIC
> draft [2]. It will run for 2 weeks, concluding at end of day 2025-09-30
> Anywhere on Earth [3].
>
> Please file issues on Github [4], or alternatively raise them on the list.
>
> Cheers
> Lucas & Matt
> QUIC WG Chairs
>
> [1]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/RGC2yETRi1NWK8ANx1QOd7tqdFA/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-multipath/
> [3] https://www.timeanddate.com/time/zones/aoe
> [4] https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues
>
>
>
>