IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: QUIC v2 and Version Negotiation Needs Your Deployment Feedback

kevin SiscoKevin <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com> Thu, 01 December 2022 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84924C14F74F for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:51:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.845
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FZsKAGTC_Xqt for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023BDC14F6EC for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id h16so2292398qtu.2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:51:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:from:content-language:references:cc:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=qzIL6sT09i4qDopBtFsiIw8jBRV3YPxLzOH1vIWK2ro=; b=dqOzBBOIBzOWp0BdhyH5+FFTF6NnxZGvKWVOi4LCPz1PLB79xEXHYiYO63gWRtzrF7 wiZ4Wrk8N6YfcZspnAE6ygS85qPVsQmqEqFCrE5soytKdPhzRk81WniES1yIc/Ih/hK4 4HJp9Tl68BrjoqCPvtUPWsYljJ3F3pp2MUEyJesjAbsfNruAIeumPq7totqsSvCXLugV KcfBCyyDMuaXbOTVR6xqSHyzn++VQhGhIpT6FfSYmUKmm/rCVCtd3ZFrMH8ao4PMjJAj bhF9Wch8djR3k4D/dCZWM+1fuyk2tBoXxyYnt34sx2I7+PlKOnjEAPBQcI3NcBMgCQuw pGdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:from:content-language:references:cc:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qzIL6sT09i4qDopBtFsiIw8jBRV3YPxLzOH1vIWK2ro=; b=UvxyMrluPni1SNcqdjP9hXqP0hLE0j1k5nc8U0ggkwspfNF8bIZfqWlycDQRvpccbJ oYWkOQkPUzMV7OsNf9eQqf/YyyfvvTt4IG/ndlDiGp9KgbmvaJ7g7FWSaaL0uZZCn8mW 9h4/6XPoSMprJhGd4FO5yIqXQXNKauHBv73NFtarPUWZmiQt1U6W84tJIfE7tGasGNei QiD/ngnjT8OQbLgV1Oh00SmdosHwiCfokrZw+NTo4ygME6gkzsMcQiJzD8iNWXY9EC5W Z4bVAn5hnjuGWl3V5+zQvGjBfUliK8+/TiQyGXOQ6z5Qie8HNw14faQ4SgF6o0EAHlvk LqLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkXVOpog+JY6YRm+l/ww7kwDwsM6LlqMXGeMQenNfdvYYYGj/hX 0nx0k4rY5H+56JlQ/JyLdaiocxW9A/CwRQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4jR1oVEkubC5hZ1mJRQc3Fd1pYTZB7CF0kYfJdatRSvmtg077h1bS5I2fQ4z1czAfLQwV59g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:4d8d:b0:3a5:2307:9ee6 with SMTP id ff13-20020a05622a4d8d00b003a523079ee6mr48633099qtb.473.1669924277042; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (ool-44c74218.dyn.optonline.net. [68.199.66.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w9-20020a05620a424900b006fc2f74ad12sm4054248qko.92.2022.12.01.11.51.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:51:16 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------lGAQFbh04ifjEzNFPc4EyhA0"
Message-ID: <d9828d31-4dd3-e5b4-6156-6f187e6a3c1b@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:51:15 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Subject: Re: QUIC v2 and Version Negotiation Needs Your Deployment Feedback
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
References: <CADdTf+hGE5LGviD7py+3j8SDLUZY9dA=OUkiLQ=DrgcnVK815A@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxQuzW6GA4WK0s=ieh_7Krsdj1G12K=stepJBUQ4M34tjA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: kevin SiscoKevin <kevinsisco61784@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxQuzW6GA4WK0s=ieh_7Krsdj1G12K=stepJBUQ4M34tjA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/cpWGyk-GWjWZnWxdPTP5yakW9bg>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:51:21 -0000

I am tempted to say yes to that but I worry that problems in handshaking 
could cause unneeded lag.  This could cause crashing I would think.

Kevin

my software store:

https://ko-fi.com/kjsisco56927


On 12/1/2022 11:41 AM, Martin Duke wrote:
> Relatedly, if I roll a new QUIC version field, should I also rev the 
> salt, retry key, and so on?
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 8:41 AM Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Greetings QUIC WG,
>
>     We are currently in a situation where the v2 and Version
>     Negotiation documents are stalled pending IANA assignments. MT
>     raised this issue recently on the list[1], and we are boosting
>     visibility once again since these allocations have implications
>     for anyone who has deployed VN/v2 code, as changes will likely
>     cause negotiation failures. We are currently leaning towards going
>     with MT's suggestion, which is to allocate new codepoints for the
>     VN transport parameter as well as the v2 version. Please provide
>     any feedback for/against either in this thread or the original.
>
>     Best,
>     Matt & Lucas
>     QUIC WG Chairs
>
>     [1]
>     https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/f4kdku9pqI6raepT_L3z_pth3Uo/
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email