Re: draft-ietf-quic-http-29, "1.1. Prior versions of HTTP"

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 12 June 2020 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E103A0820 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VxnKtjqc368T for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 306AA3A07A9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1591971695; bh=R5qjr9NWQdE1fqikesJwPoDMbnGEMrEIGXNrrTu1dIg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=lV84/MpGcxAefOflYfdziUiOU927p+VmIGv+x5gOVEkNPODzALILsHmD21KRxGoOf 9vvYPAapzf01+ZFT0fyRgQVsqQgOxtZd+4i9eIMLtR1QkXQLcRBaiaHrWG+4w7p2PG G0UsR3oNH+155k5/r0EczfFzcwZmRpx6IhfrfEo4=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.182] ([84.171.150.215]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mirng-1jFvad1OkO-00ev4I; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 16:21:35 +0200
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-quic-http-29, "1.1. Prior versions of HTTP"
To: Robin MARX <robin.marx@uhasselt.be>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
References: <8c747b59-1672-4ccb-dfce-0914e74c504f@gmx.de> <CAC7UV9bmX2Ta5dgazge1NQdpCW2UshVvy4fUD4pwF+=BNLW5Qw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <672c5568-e137-0105-b043-baba983a289e@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 16:21:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC7UV9bmX2Ta5dgazge1NQdpCW2UshVvy4fUD4pwF+=BNLW5Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Uocq1+UZbj3LkfiiZ8FerPgVfUgdso3Zd9J8WdupcUOLQDIuv5K 8cvTKWj3HH2sJOmyXLo4XgGjO5+Xsk+MJl+LYG+BGx7+93YNmYCby4HRc1QDU4pak09J3mb 8csq0+vmL5chkvr2vYXO6D9ynfJ+We/UIp+QIGvRQOaM5HWrrJ9P3QfBovgnYQxbZ2pUcxl BAfDTWM1L3leq/cr0tFSA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Xw3bpvOipso=:ZDXKXWmaYwPNPOpe2a/p0Z 6hrfDFnPbEztGuFP48zc6uuhUELox+zAg8BQJjCvQ3nsSYXRpCXwMQFicogGaU/wvmU7+9nS7 h66/11J5ZQMVY3nN8DKqq2JUHKmVtBRwOkOzM2lL66/onEWAfGr3VREALgutaa8D8V9ZHa71a X2AghcZj3WRYaHNbb5+w/7g4ndCxII2y9dSwu69J1DqSlr3kHcEcPefWERI85oj2P1f8nDB5l bfKUVcGEA+OqjAddda5Yshqmlvdw5MEfg8LqdyOl8ZPYR5CyzU+4xW80llsLbVyEJBOuBzoQi gz+vbdLku708x4BeSXgb6+DfRyPisjN1G4ekgLuTMC4epTCbkWe2fg36jALmmS2pMe1JN9BMZ QNjtf7h8U3d1Mof9tmAirejcUw6jrspNxbfHLgee2RWQj6NfIPgpWnRNWfgE9CKxj/Yxm9546 pEBUs+3TakjQQOyJ/2RL/O6VG+lgkWM6uu4jig5orDotwssvk6RlnKRbBLGpCTHUtfwYcIG4D OPVH8Hm3wVykTdFDS1uEA8JN/Ag9je35yS6Zn4KKzfygE6dDodr3wzjdGmbENOvUNvAnSEWUC fuGm7q0Jkz8AX0k6GKTs7Bs+5ILaKSacFH8cEbvdkqCfHsMseVcUBO/yf/ei2kJqSea9ImkTx VlRUCkJV+LWHgU5is6muBkCvb3g606XYyPxLUHQvAbrLkL7rWh24s4RLIrvDoM+mL9JEwfxiG keJVu6YX9raQsB8J9CcmX0EGhAt6AZGkLpqRHCX/x+2bYWRPQ8/RLyGGE+bDFGqVUEqBQMKTf jmZwERHaHWx55BK2ewRyfvs1Qwu4MaCM3WjqZt6l7Mw3Dm191stOJDg0Rkcjf7C3XXRUUMR1R moBdvVGgV4Lw+huuelMRkd0jLR6s9iXe6hYjCNQnFjQU5wFcEf2B7ChBwj9XlgtWa25cqB+Ck TeNf9wSDVkPhkX6t7gw866qIOzR3u/lQ4uxtB7t9C85xwgXV48UyGOjUztFuaMvsLTRkrPKm4 S6MwLLEV7EHhehVxWcqCOMX/2Gs2nca5lr4bQ45YqK/j+mkts38O0I2dELwgSaFfl+iJ6dunN QAJYZtQ/VPCvgPn/wtGlZD8wTNSEjGgXBun+X8WewP6c3cm8k1JzuaqD9fUILnHawNRYWx2oB cFYzTDQcREb1yuw0ujMrpQgMMa18DBquhZz+4yg7QwIS46Z9Ea85xhSGYubm5rU7ktXyxyPsB ZYyZLUy3+iIQ40FFn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/cx-p37ObrQFqYEGl_raIF-47IGc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:21:40 -0000

On 12.06.2020 15:20, Robin MARX wrote:
> Hello Julian,
>
> To me, the crux is in the "at a time", which I feel makes the statement
> correct.
 > ...

Not really; if the server is not broken I can send multiple GET requests
without having read any response yet.

Best regards, Julian