Re: Consensus call for Late-stage documents, April 2020 edition

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 08 May 2020 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6493A3A1000 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 15:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WybWIBco5ElJ for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F9603A0FFE for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 15:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id a21so3317619ljb.9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 May 2020 15:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=R9g5GsQ1aUtHYXg5CPY0znvMPlXJ8VJpEFh1xz6AIps=; b=ZJJy8BZAkeNIwbREuJwHpbD26GatqoixdQ77Caplt1JbmeSn8LyAcf3enLv02ZATra xSq7AxvjEHeH7f9I5jUH3HFJ9yg59oDb/SwAeDsXvDdPhRVrLK03lh4DFw7u5z8iO2Q8 iNGXcE1qndTzTAwsgrE/iO2G1ucHS9VJqQyIKM8tph41JV2f/m6FpLV+82/3+2fkoWl+ Fg7cRKeQLgLm8+SS+/ixbmRF/lAGyRI0BNCai/wCmBZfLQngJBUW3Vl9N+IS7cuGbSps tsQfroAKRjwUHpbcYPO1K4gWEjoVF9TWblMe8w+W9M+E/xSyPxSv+RtqBSWVqdHgNAoN RPfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R9g5GsQ1aUtHYXg5CPY0znvMPlXJ8VJpEFh1xz6AIps=; b=st3ha+zsep0UL9eQh610bvSctd6ObL1jlmTL04pgoS1d79mCSpo3RozDpHc0tiV9PE e3kCvWlSCr7OeCJ5nWxzqEgmWMaEcrIfpobgo+buCJBTG7J4bgW7sq9D5T+3Sj7Hwr1l 7Cd3COH1E8J6tQsTaAsUYRFXrLX14GUVBKcHBKehw3znlmL+rNeZMn3CLkbUOuxnBYgr 8wybqsyp28/N12F0I82lMoxGyWRbu2OH2yNStA0Gc8jdNV5/5zdot66DU7DPqYD+MbJz 9ixxKu84jHI2M0Qm5/pnwCC8wbZVK4y7qiXMNoCvX/BvGQJ8vk8lKHNYJSL7xBG9ut5/ UTCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ENqMzPgMAPm/5Z9R8BcmZDW7TODXWDu9sfOZhXQHXFlrUk+K7 PUvCtWUMMwlhTj36B4GL7DLDs4jWTIo7N4l+DjiyMg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHaCuleHFoD6v6Kqq1WPw2RZdBvZ6exRPMBt6IWZ2e8+32t+oBmZondm5Qs2h+HsRHEbSp/TEEIqkSLvQgmfo=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:87d3:: with SMTP id v19mr2935438ljj.176.1588977380532; Fri, 08 May 2020 15:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9oa8JDkCDPF11mS1LakLy=_Ot3VCLwSUst+TDfxd=a+a_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oa8JDkCDPF11mS1LakLy=_Ot3VCLwSUst+TDfxd=a+a_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 15:35:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMgCrEKisrAAJeKs3YNSCkgHeWhmvHD48nv3QeEasRz=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus call for Late-stage documents, April 2020 edition
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000052b90305a52aa0e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/dCv8-JhAuh5bhGeNYDsLTZpRWCk>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 22:36:28 -0000

I've made what may be editorial comments on some of these that I'd like to
see resolved.

I think #3439 needs more work. I spent a while going through it and I'm not
yet sure I understand what it says (see the email I just sent) and so am
unable to say if i addresses the issue it is intended to.

-Ekr


On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 7:08 AM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far
> seems
> to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the
> issue or
> in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent
> any
> pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them in two weeks' time.
>
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current
> state of
> issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at
> <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
>
> * #3594: Prohibit TLS middlebox compatibility mode
>   The proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3595
>
> * #3571: SHOULD implement adaptive packet threshold loss detection
>   The proposal is make no design change but add the editorial change
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3572
>
> * #3560: Equivalence of preferred_address and NEW_CONNECTION_ID
>   The proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3565
>
> * #3559: Linkability with preferred_address usage
>   The proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3563
>
> * #3509: Required state for retaining unacked RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames
> is unbound
>   The proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3547
>
> * #3439: Authenticating connection IDs
>   The proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3499
>
> * #3427: active_connection_id_limit description is unclear about whose
> connection ID might be zero length
>   The proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3426
>
> * #3353: Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear
>   The proposal is make no design change but add the editorial change
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3589
>
> * #3265: Add capability for sending HTTP metadata (trailer fields) in
> mid-stream
>   The proposal is to mark this as v2 for now. We can unmark if the HTTP
> progresses faster than us, and we decide to incorporate it in some way.
>
> * #3198: HTTP/3 is lacking priorities
>   The proposal is to mark this as v2 for now. We can unmark if the HTTP
> progresses faster than us, and we decide to incorporate it in some way.
>
> Regar ds
> Lars, Lucas and Mark
> QUIC Chairs
>