Re: Big changes in -17

[Jana Iyengar <[e-mail]>]

Alexandre,

Are you really asking if an alternative design for the spin-bit(s) can be
proposed now, or am I mis-reading your question?

- jana

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:26 AM <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hello Martin,
>
> On 10/26/2018 01:20 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > 4. The first octet.  We discussed this in NY:
> >
> https://github.com/quicwg/wg-materials/blob/master/interim-18-09/minutes.md#first-octet---martin-thomson
> > and we will have a decision about the spin bit within 2 weeks.  After
> > that, one of the designs discussed will be implemented.
>
> Do I assume correctly that "the designs discussed" are the following three:
>
>   - nothing (no spin bit)
>   - spin bit alone
>   - spin bit + VEC
>
> Or is there room for other (written) proposals ?
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>