Consensus call for qlog serialization format (issue #144)

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Mon, 02 August 2021 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4BE3A1DB1; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 06:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihUlSyhWqnwC; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 06:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75ACA3A1DB0; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 06:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id yk17so23190216ejb.11; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 06:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Upseb12GzO2dWoZkvn5bP+TU21IO/OVp92HYszCnPMI=; b=StOvbYzaVEmP5KCqqXjw59NexxBBN9OL15ys/C3J85CL9T3MO94V2Uy1kXYRtPJw4l Dfc24B4W2gNiFfc1Bt6P/TnGGD9n6jbtJkPa9gY3vAKklSMB6IyIkmlB5y6RPZII4aO9 j6ZGkNLz9fHq0ho3YLfruIB2Xrlmz+Zt3XGgY5+eg+AyWfaU7IYjx/2LIuGpX0OFt2ZS dTyVSYlaN3EEbwQdIMMwhCfnVegswidsZQNhSl1jkdgywNzRD6KNDK/anLuGXwWAW2n/ 6CuCtXbiXymJ1H19LZyL3sxoNR1hTWJ02NL1DnINBbQ0JXQSZtCIKokrfY8fRrCcOVrt eXUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Upseb12GzO2dWoZkvn5bP+TU21IO/OVp92HYszCnPMI=; b=j4swudfuTbn71QsDaIWCJjQmvYrUGU75NBf2nmPJS4i1/Hf3ncq6lcs/BP29Wmzth6 5gV2ToeTfFCAVecwsg4nANeeS/VHuyUfJQoKTdbbscM2rie++I4hNhp/Tr4MMhoqLZ4L 3Jz22QwfxwLXPMuVPCQLYj/dIswdGyqnwjCGNjA8vY+6nsyzEwXQrAMFqunyOZjcor0C 0l4yflvcdVMJCZ/R3Oeg9g5uSd3svXfasA3DxJ8B8fuqXFg/IE6AfqQbMahpmrhoIjF5 9KD50sbYLhaiQTAosZpCtFPDBhlTYAXlvvd+7+xPwadW/WOU3SW8fk7sZEiIITeBqvCE 0u4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ip1OVXL2ULA6IFlUzW7Nac/A3v0m+uHNXahMBrmbDqZIPq3CJ e+GrMNaa68E8LIve6XVoVgUgcqck+kSTOEtD3kDiJDRLTXU3lg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8C7gR5kdT7pBKP7PclZHUqM/Mie/fy9OKS8ln+wPofabw92SCBxSDlTcNUKWLtXx2P3CyQfmyh7r9HAXTBAM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8443:: with SMTP id e3mr15801745ejy.46.1627910633207; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 06:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:23:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZS=k8XhyfugHH6VmdMVAAj6ER8s18g5eaZqX_3hie4ig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Consensus call for qlog serialization format (issue #144)
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Cc: QUIC WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000004badc05c8937b2e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/ffKUP5gOi8i8_uqZEBEiGGBNV8o>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:23:58 -0000

Hello QUIC WG,

During the IETF 111 meeting discussion of qlog, we discussed the
serialization format tracked on issue #114 [1].

The feeling in the room was to keep the JSON serialization format. Noting
that implementations can use their own intermediate formats and transform
to and from JSON as needed, and that future documents could specify other
interop formats if there is sufficient interest.

The proposed resolution for this matter is to keep the JSON serialization
format as the canonical interoperable format. This email seeks to establish
consensus for this. If you have comments, for or against, please respond on
the issue. The call will run until EoD August 9 2021.

Best Regards
Matt & Lucas
QUIC WG Chairs

[1] - https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/144