IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: draft-schinazi-quic-version-negotiation

Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com> Wed, 11 December 2019 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rch@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7D012085B for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:06:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9uk3yrL_T-Ni for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A368D1208B1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id b6so552934wrq.0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:06:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b99dpNVvFPaapReUsoK6pExpGSBR7yvDJrsg03XxFXo=; b=RkAejDY3HUGMpecMNjGuL62hPE+myKLiheeQM143lzSSCX3qI7aba5QTvIpPSQ7Yvd mDJty59rl3fL7CtUDVjiepnQvlqCijnonGoqb3o6vjjtj1lIGWp6m0M/u8T77zhBpfrj mAcpozDe3PgCNQjhCz5n9o3jc3DESWikZ3tusbkVVpgMPQZYzPM/sJgXK0OieTnpW7VY kyyOioB5vu7cQO+LeIRKBGkZf3kuz5KcvbxGSs95PmO1tF3lMSOdHLT4Soud22XpNioD TzC/sV1AGyQR/lD9eDqQjEbTa8Bh0GLEyC6asuQ/N2HNxz67BGnHJS9jY7j7dfmHtjo2 gJnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b99dpNVvFPaapReUsoK6pExpGSBR7yvDJrsg03XxFXo=; b=s726+HzN/z5vYT+C5P/YWkgct4Co6PHjXDLAETZPNQapfsyq7TgSzpSwiBIWus7xy2 UWSX+M5bMQH9vSx1MIDD/7RHDaCXFSwDuObzKYxMfJBNJVejiB8gwYVa9UdHAHJx4l3X WDQXz3A5Wax91dQU9X42VymPbBeOpbbg9Su7QtUMDMhUqiAjshQjrKiX2GLzEyV/FYeK fnBDGSiqsG7WPe9Rql4VM8yGVOw0h5QUEuKETWtBFUZ7shH8GMY6rEluCwwMvhfDWqoU ZBMzclSYn5gkLceqfhv39XuQqVnV6xYfOBzmkPGp/O3OmPXh80Fw2vUiLg3emIYaw3pD m0vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUTlZ3GXCHuzHPPNIIRPi49NLTo1NhTfMrOe4M9O3OObv0hSMOd 73iSG7lhgGi2GerAk6Bxu0b9Nu1zYv6YpiwueQWftg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx/9yoMVcTHj7enWJn36sDYEG2ExbpLZdhjetK2dn72eYFRg3fFkmr/dDSmno1m8wSmSp+ocmN06RqtFwihV+E=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:488c:: with SMTP id g12mr2421416wrq.67.1576105576584; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:06:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <080BEA58-D52B-4552-A11C-03D5BFCDFAE3@mnot.net> <CACpbDcfYExjOEsTcHs01tLKp5Stk8mhx2to53dv4oqedhF+o7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACpbDcfYExjOEsTcHs01tLKp5Stk8mhx2to53dv4oqedhF+o7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:06:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJ_4DfSQ3eo4g8785t+qi=6Yrv1kVafuJT4-Y-+Dafgi42rA8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-schinazi-quic-version-negotiation
To: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000005e32b059975ad3f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/g5-nC-Mt_1Z3YLeprmzGTFA3y6k>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:06:22 -0000

I definitely support adopting this document.

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 1:50 PM Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Not having a mechanism means that any work on a next version (even local
> experiments) is effectively stymied,
>

Eh? That's a bit overbroad isn't it? If you want to locally experiment with
a non-standardized QUIC v2, surely you can experiment with
a non-standardized VN mechanism, right? Or you can even do no VN at all if
your local clients can learn out of band (alt-svc) that your local server
supports your new v2.

Of course, I still support adopting this document. :)

Cheers,

Ryan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email