IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Connection IDs

Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 March 2018 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB2012D88B for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:04:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g2SAjcKB2jfV for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x241.google.com (mail-wr0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0711126DD9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x241.google.com with SMTP id v65so19201834wrc.11 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 17:04:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GLFmXdgT53FU9r0tajuwqQdPont6neZtcIlw9l3qgm8=; b=MUxfOEmSZ8jtFgvMTu9mpvVxGXI+8HBZGJO9y1C39z0GIwe/+BtqfMqSla29MAq2w7 m3NArn7NsR+04FrLxyjgEpeGiM5vtYR1bnDrfpjRF2XuIski3cryJ4/wFEo39SK7Y0su g9gI+k4QltPhIhC06EFCw09QmDrtTefHiuU8Qx9bF67yOdSxxdAoWj3ir3V2Sc6s8GLy 3cxkmD3cT5+8oOKqNfLnSfU2kaKK43fk+RqmGyfbdktGU404A8Mn4hskIwZCL4tnXYE3 I5wPsI4MrKbltOOqhq/xD9fDrAt+DTTWaea7ny0Ol4RcTj3J+3zYtRYvwbJjGjHcK+ZR faXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GLFmXdgT53FU9r0tajuwqQdPont6neZtcIlw9l3qgm8=; b=NL17UvBwo9+YLeYz24ddbnqnNUckxjzuRJYVCwYubtPZUBukPb4VDxHHFrFyPbh+TZ Sgzctk1ARwxdUBDlicAO+658hcGXxf27HWnE6TEgH3GpRQ55eeKcqaA8wUpakzdyEt+V 5yoO4UxGOvxtd36VAEc19VIgWO938X0Cy5gvX9ti6Ws2+86PR+PLjlIucgIvIX1E1cdM RPC0dOaaOniBv7L8a5J5+MDo3yIkzWSs9fWmtryIIDtGvr+5T4mVHxqpZ6FTf0mEjWK4 ADBP6ePniLjT9J6VTsNLEgIGZRr2KY/UFquiaFSlQB1IPr63h+eKAhXzdYL/9uMq/Zw7 KT0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCW8fB7A2N63pGLDlAc9wzWaLBE8rytQUp0Zx/dUs4MXnP2kAHq UPNOtFcK8f5igy25Hy5SszOBHJNAYLppSmShhlc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuZe0d2saUBwU5sYmEg4/7i88Qyz2nY96LB42sD4qzVhTTrc8LCx52bUmya9KleU2+Af0puojuWKYnIfn9cjhA=
X-Received: by 10.223.163.85 with SMTP id d21mr14193684wrb.105.1520298243595; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 17:04:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.195.139 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:04:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKcm_gMR070JUegQbDw--RNr+0XYiBMwaTM3MBmqUo21u922TQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnVSCnmzjWOZwQM+ctTxFXVzsVYe6Q3Zzk4yj3LNTYUtHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNo9qmZqmEXBGM4bM6q3EO1FGuUxLSSWsVhNEYsn5u9puQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gMR070JUegQbDw--RNr+0XYiBMwaTM3MBmqUo21u922TQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 17:04:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CACpbDccpuNWnX=Y+gKaPxLEjUOnvu+hr9FqH+R6ZspwOfUq-qg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Connection IDs
To: Ian Swett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f14e8c321610566b4045d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/gNede8MPfOJm1EOW_k2tKQE-R88>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 01:04:08 -0000

+1 to this is the direction we're all converging on.

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Ian Swett <
ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Agreed, I unsurprisingly think this is the right direction.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:05 AM Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
>
>> big picture this is good.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I've written up a PR that enacts the changes suggested by the design
>>> team [1].
>>>
>>> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1151
>>>
>>> This adds two connection IDs to the long header.  An explicit length
>>> is added for each.
>>>
>>> The short header includes the raw connection ID without any C bit or
>>> length.
>>>
>>> I've tried to explain the limitations of the design where they apply.
>>> That includes stateless reset.
>>>
>>> This PR necessarily includes some choices about less critical aspects,
>>> such as how connection ID lengths are encoded.  I ask that you try to
>>> separate objections about minor issues like this from more serious
>>> structural concerns.  I'm happy to discuss details, but I'm most
>>> interested in whether this is broadly the right direction first.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> p.s., happy draft submission deadline day
>>>
>>> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/l_
>>> b1NnBmQpQGCxCfQteOMkft-lE
>>>
>>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email