Re: Second Implementation Draft Guidelines

Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jri@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3991A1289B0 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8rlttmkG4yUH for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ADDD127977 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id e187so29810115pgc.1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XVs2eBrNtMlFCq8cm6UyEFRkxRUc+0iEEwEO9v6f+7M=; b=V5HopoQrNwhLtmxiVbFO9qEnEUX1lUo1PA4A65C052FgWPuUeN74cm26AOPZc9NpPW xtnVFfP7xgcciLU/jV6m8/R/RzF/h1W7krys/N6lILeFV0IgeEXeGJdv8aBLrhiPG1CT qSdYTP+k3oh2eBeEP9IBzUNZh5nJMoitkw4OtyNnr6XPUYFxDsZwZhmf6BzmitPTuZt2 75DGVHuXy7Cs1BMKPYcfB861mC18cJ3BOdZ+WGiU6d+md0O4u0QKMq0AX11RhS184y8h bBc/nsBFRVYD97KkJj0JhlEu0IkMqUb9al0JBa3XEsATJzttbwZ5rSJFdMJgJSTi+dzo 9Gzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XVs2eBrNtMlFCq8cm6UyEFRkxRUc+0iEEwEO9v6f+7M=; b=E+HriDOizxXOOMn9eM72KAbjtJj7fC+yV0kTkfGrdfYLgWPTSt6CP9Yvhm9cNSx1b9 RNgUjm63Fr4+7rBLcoulBUQDM8yfWinkm82G3DPq2y/EGmZXCjohrP3N0bd3mb5DrpZ3 7OpAcZDCkVCBJjUTKDAL3PDPhrMm6m0mo9izhqmQogvG9YO5C9SJoCjL2IGfpl6S14RP uRyxHGBwA1UeqWjKh2eJXV1a8HWy+L1i+qJkP9ceeqlaDeEQjWBmeiJNpQcdKUKvV0oz WOkvOWAbMKFkCFXhAsdiVfXYE9MR+sTWMKFjdGGccNIsEUrRlnl3JIgOZ8OYYWE18p+H 0LLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz0j/XL4oFV1ahbvWpVWbsGg/dl2nyofaM0e9/bEhPp3XExwNn2 ZJuKRGHB/pmIwHaSGc2kX4Cg6gFoHyguuHE=
X-Received: by 10.99.121.1 with SMTP id u1mr14716563pgc.20.1498080151837; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.179.39 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxQqbcuB_naqU+L-ZQ+8CF23oHN37u7OAfPOw_TT2yUBYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM4esxQqbcuB_naqU+L-ZQ+8CF23oHN37u7OAfPOw_TT2yUBYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:22:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGD1bZa6vjLTdsyy3-3Kvg15BXZxtwWaBb2ajeBT_4gYGs10WA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Second Implementation Draft Guidelines
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0ef2604c1a9705527ef761"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/h6DHED5uCMEX7myEARrhFLBzI-c>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 21:22:34 -0000

This is a great start, thanks for getting it going.
Just one thought: You may want to explicitly "include" fixed-time
RTO-recovery. It appears right now as a side note in what's not included.

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
wrote:

> All,
>
> As promised, I've created a set of guidelines for what should be in the
> Second Implementation draft. If deadlines hold, I believe we will actually
> start implementing this draft after Seattle in October.
>
> Once we've reached reasonable consensus, this should serve as a basis for
> prioritizing issues to resolve through Seattle.
>
> The current version is very much a starting point for discussion. I've
> presented some items I think are important to include, and others that we
> could bring in depending on our appetite for work. The final version will
> simply have "Must Include" and "should not include".
>
> <http://goog_314636520>
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/wiki/Second-Implementation-Draft
>
> I look forward to your comments.
>
> Martin
>