Re: Big changes in -17

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 29 October 2018 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664CE131002 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cteVAuWmM9cq for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA5F1277CC for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 14so9271186oth.2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wxYoEEe3NeZVgPAQygR2dBgXDKpIuIQTDV2oLBW70HA=; b=DXeSBRPv96OSk2tqn3ILFS8Dt8Sc5TmSlP2L9L/wXbcvzzvUnVW8Gi85Tj+l9A7swx bjH3YUiv36bcwp/zV7T3qVb1cLCpohPuDS2Q1a/NWfOTnCE0iomgKSNUYa1PUhrbTqmR P3Il3fu8/bHpSRNQUwsIe5u5ipLrR4DJTwui/J60/jVGb7/SRoQLrKdCdX2/eDmL4h4T C/u4w+qnfvZ5n046eLjrJJ94BUHK5kXN1BkX4cSyWQHTQrAf41J5RCiHUC939Uv6JFdM 7YK4+sLX9rBdfZG2SM9bYr1ByIijWZf3TZVWRDuarPrnH7wgJMN/vpcAT3K/DPoLLxbD 6H9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wxYoEEe3NeZVgPAQygR2dBgXDKpIuIQTDV2oLBW70HA=; b=ujlQL8kjBUhcPUt+eqEjvO3Js4ZLsIwTxbJ9Uczof8TAcpMdC2aaJ86HYeOucaVEFE 2itp6W+460+yFZHWFPj4tszjIKqd3FhQoLcElD7GuuJpZ1Sj7C3OWRdNUDFC+2Kd2HkC GiOzvfaqrnBoN47/JD362HM1llruw19YYRiIVInVldUYXR86lXVwUfvC2PHhA5cqABGB kZLVAIaAH08ai9uY8CFjx5w5uwY03CsCycabJP3iHVdOFwTIa5Jrz+doF2UAGVkguYK3 kCjGP9p09utR5+oT5Amo1GD4vre7G1r47Y0/bxCbGrX4TuKxgtsv7Jz/I/rjjTpV/Y5B PMqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gI4o1ZgiEF9NhT+03t6N/rhqHLAnZv7NkDdooAdszvktVkZWsAy SLP5k9LBgCfEbvH7/nIo0MmaU2j35VNuJrUnmC8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5ews1dy0lG8vW8yAuqtYinBjJDuOru+pFFymzlrN96hFFIV02cocwLD0Nf1RAsHMruEDyjpIRAY99SuMtU/MkU=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6101:: with SMTP id i1mr10328440otj.310.1540852532126; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABkgnnVFqdx4VYbqT7SztPf8Q+vWMV86VkOHY-4aGSpauNPapg@mail.gmail.com> <851_1540819578_5BD70A7A_851_343_1_0ada4f1d-e8c5-25b5-0e8b-8111ee726ae7@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <851_1540819578_5BD70A7A_851_343_1_0ada4f1d-e8c5-25b5-0e8b-8111ee726ae7@orange.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:35:22 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVG6tT_h9AyoOSBd6qy5eRn0EZ4LO_Z+h-cTgj+MkECmA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Big changes in -17
To: alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/hafnRahlFVPKONsqP4bFJZngkKE>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:35:34 -0000

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:26 AM <alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com> wrote:
> Do I assume correctly that "the designs discussed" are the following three:
>
>   - nothing (no spin bit)
>   - spin bit alone
>   - spin bit + VEC
>
> Or is there room for other (written) proposals ?

You should refer to the email from Lars.  I believe that the approach
they propose only considers "no spin bit" vs. "spin bit alone".