Re: Who wants -10 drafts?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 21 February 2018 03:45 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9F9124234 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:45:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9DtLq0QIOlIJ for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x230.google.com (mail-ot0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BC01243FE for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 41so259918otd.13 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:45:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WwOEic92sa8niiZ4skoxVRZcyDZ+qGL+gIkl1svUXnw=; b=WPxWFo0KVQ0+1whqj1HOYTdHooI1LTmw+Dx7nhF/jY+5Pz6SKpDf3n/ogKB9is4n76 dYNETXhlk5u9w9ESXhPVRT1TxQmEo7IayrMzMwI+qmcpq38wwU9c9RyYpVp9K2pJ81cf WANFHvE0+v7xAzwW+tQreTpuxItIfL1bomP32MJYhoNtP56WyBhPuLzM7Q9pItOVTtoj B37nP6URhGTW3GZYrNR9pNclkWZyYVC0gM+e2ZV5meY9f5vZBhyxABfUQcI+Flh9HPyy K+osJPtlw1fcCjn1e3MWP2EQaaBuh0yDKQdUpeqQIriu2NWctb4Y3xQkLmuqFl0VtZT4 l6Mw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WwOEic92sa8niiZ4skoxVRZcyDZ+qGL+gIkl1svUXnw=; b=knemEn4y9VKQaSsKo5bU4lv7lxUYqxi+hyUUN4tc/xqoqifSod5j7b2GuCRv38mJLR zH+pVqrc6qg7lLup6CdY4LTuW4KwXO7573v0PGSJroOUWCmWz1GRYlU2z9QuUNszmeqC f13fnJ+5OT0wsmLq9M2Prd3kg9cGIxnpchr0pItN/rQoTP4oaC6gRsLd5lpVC3/e/ELj IK+aY9BkogHBPVxkAqyINDVkDbHzuCPOPru2lZF0995PmzuxHfXCTXmSA0YTA+u2iRcX 9qkgH5AqPTIky2brEqF1Wx9mbSB8HWAGZScJDLL4rQyrer7VbEW8bHp4BM8YWQfayBsD fm4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDDuiBjdWFT+9/+GCT69ezpMlSsQ8iE7d2TEwXYJ0MKIMbCABXd o2oU4UnZL5hI4DTaFSnsj2fj5EX53Y7DA1l7oGo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2245+rUYgYwCMs0M6Nr+jYb88bFUg730sPgswBJGb9YFlQLnLGWpQzUkReI/EMOZx6am/CI0WHq0e/YDXcyS+Xo=
X-Received: by 10.157.14.163 with SMTP id 32mr1277437otj.396.1519184703269; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:45:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.16.85 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:45:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMfnMho_E7HMpVWWH-UivDkSODLzZG-a8O0seJ4ZggYmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnVWdRYDKUwgrfTjRmb9q_M9bAiysVYy-zDicGLrEGcvng@mail.gmail.com> <4A74CD08-00C9-451A-80E8-E6AD7F644DED@apple.com> <CABkgnnUBZdexEaxbnXb+L1U-b0mMZ9MH91ZnDduGqT97vcF+Yw@mail.gmail.com> <09090022-d773-bde5-afe8-48535f02693a@huitema.net> <CABcZeBMfnMho_E7HMpVWWH-UivDkSODLzZG-a8O0seJ4ZggYmg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:45:02 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWvgE_muuaF5B-ez9v14cGbqvfa9YDaHJn-AixJcEM0sA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Who wants -10 drafts?
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/jSDDOgPrAp3Vek64BQs5i2pFFe4>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 03:45:06 -0000

No risk of that.

Some people are looking to take the next step and get some experience
with a non-toy upper layer.  I agree that for the group as a whole,
that step is a little way away just yet.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> I would be very sad if we needed the H2 implementation to test QUIC. That
> seems like it would be bad for layering.
>
> -Ekr
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/20/2018 6:08 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> For the purposes of the interop, I believe we were still doing HTTP 0.9.
>> Has that changed?
>>
>> Yes, interop is QUIC -09 and HTTP 0.9 (no relation).
>>
>> I’m not sure how many people will take advantage of hq-10 interop but I
>> don’t see any harm in publishing -10 drafts.
>>
>> I might, but whether that is possible will depend on a great many
>> things.  Nor do I think my own implementation matters much in
>> determining this.
>>
>>
>> I understand that at some point we must start moving up the stack and test
>> the HTTP mappings. I am not anywhere close to ready with that, because I am
>> not starting with an HTTP 2 implementation. If it is what is takes to test
>> the transport, I will do one, or port one. But no way I can do that in the
>> next 8 days.
>>
>> -- Christian Huitema
>
>