Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: quic@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: quic@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CD1E354EBB
	for <quic@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 02:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
	t=1777194016; bh=fu96nPEQcEkUfjPbItmJ81h+Ppeyp6XOyUVp2MjQJjk=;
	h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject;
	b=Aushrw0vuFsKJDAHHRzC+n2BvN1zPSNAS1g4X6W2bMxrpne3mBo+YFeBu3mMzdjFV
	 pvcyFiPR5Yb4jq01LWFH96q8gVGtfNf+/jzeBvMAXztlxw+HURCRcRfcGFn/FrobXS
	 HrOZ1Uyf1b8Vfa9O5GdAqpE8EAaEEWkpxgY8NDKI=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
	header.d=lowentropy.net header.b="FrikY6Pu"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
	header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="SbMvOK49"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31])
	by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 2-1u7hOS_VSW for <quic@mail2.ietf.org>;
	Sun, 26 Apr 2026 02:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 (fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.156])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A41EE354D3A
	for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 01:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44])
	by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F797A00E8
	for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 04:59:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-imap-15 ([10.202.2.104])
  by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Apr 2026 04:59:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net;
	 h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date
	:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
	:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1777193954;
	 x=1777280354; bh=r+GkAyILu0wc9WemTWcRV4wi39pSMZJ4X8u6tHX3Etw=; b=
	FrikY6PuftpPGNAmj9oYre21XnfcxGLYvCTFd2P2zuNIJ6QNVTM0Y8Z84hi87/Ep
	chAKkz7P3WNo2Ok9IeBwmYAdrCP7prTQ5wlfH/tXKf5O515w15dA1Ag5Cz39uzPy
	RxlV6CE1gxsYjB9JGlN6jxaqamdilVM3+y4B++zZnkBluVjnoOnQXrYPAv4V/0LX
	btVwbQDRvAfFU6/E+WICI4UuPMqFkOJXvMECCB9WnuiFG4oKhmjmHZ4Kx6V8cdyr
	ozS79EsWz4xQaXNwCVmdjqvWNdulnSBsbEoHLRGpOztFofTtOY8sl4xbCJ5wHWkV
	dToKhXIqxNeHYdRZ0msGUw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
	:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from
	:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
	:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender
	:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1777193954; x=1777280354; bh=r
	+GkAyILu0wc9WemTWcRV4wi39pSMZJ4X8u6tHX3Etw=; b=SbMvOK49BE61zmPlB
	TJmCqc0BVwlqelw6JrqGdeF0+bvYoulwZYQdrNfV8GEuV8N7we+W+Q4Vx9OYd295
	dKJtTHyrmAvUh88Vw4PvK/ffXlCCf/MQVOnVqSv40WFdgQVjZPM/MU8sG6yHQ7Hz
	WsY1JPQGaP2EaeyXKYYDb+hBQcQdCYD2CVaLCHd8ivyVnkWhjlWti7h05g0Gmfsh
	0t+tMbVXoBQpuBy62mNUpYdU5K2SESf6f18Zj2gffItoNrpb4mApSLZVXvKym364
	bWFj0uLSNrRxMJh+qTgaqwJct7U7EPVIzQNpL80KqYh1bY6a9spmikAce/9gm8Sw
	njJlQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:4tPtab5bFL0FuaUK_9rUAg-rXwx-q_dAzLy3to83d0pOFVD-UeOOFA>
    <xme:4tPtabuXzv5Xmm4UYnuvENGxnkr3KNQNR0FjvAVMroNhZmmxrFYI_8yBVZhNwLqMz
    Guc-g286JqYoL1y2HXyowX6HvDKS9pdgKv5j13P1LvaIycG4CAepQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: 
 gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdejheefjecutefuodetggdotefrod
    ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr
    ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofggfffhvffkjghfufgtgfesthejredtre
    dttdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghn
    thhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueeludegfeelhfektdffveelge
    fhtefguddtfeevteettdevgefgfeeilefftefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden
    ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvthdpnh
    gspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepqhhuihgt
    sehivghtfhdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4tPtaZegbjXKrZhKxC3IVDsKAatDepmNNBmlmYDWVpJ3AoDKYdWUpw>
    <xmx:4tPtaeIeNshmx6Df1fJGhTtMAOtRvxWiHQHQtZ3PihC6Ln2d4meniw>
    <xmx:4tPtaYKdRM8JhG_zYWr9rNrmeL_GMNO5zHQpV6lmtv8kQjTXqwMwbg>
    <xmx:4tPtaYFdBz42QE9NOjjIB2j8sSR3wPCo02n5p9BPZIqKN3OgiHjZ6g>
    <xmx:4tPtaaWq99PKRpxMamorqIU283qYQee9U_g0sZVsNye_Dl1CZwH_5ISt>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 6FE75780070; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 04:59:14 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:58:36 +1000
From: "Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Message-Id: <a931377f-7c14-4cc5-a373-70cd96c7bfe3@betaapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANBHLUhansrJ62U3_YGXeVa3n-hr7H00-bdNXB7D2gaRAGvTHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANBHLUhansrJ62U3_YGXeVa3n-hr7H00-bdNXB7D2gaRAGvTHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: quic and compatibility with cryptographic implementations
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: I6P7GGHFCPXUDZKUU5S3FZZ3JH74HHNF
X-Message-ID-Hash: I6P7GGHFCPXUDZKUU5S3FZZ3JH74HHNF
X-MailFrom: mt@lowentropy.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency;
 loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-quic.ietf.org-0;
 nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size;
 news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/k2kl2W_n5WDEZBbt3O31Ef2XBbM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:quic-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:quic-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:quic-leave@ietf.org>

On Sun, Apr 26, 2026, at 11:01, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Would it help with
> interoperability with such strict cryptographic libraries if the
> destination connection ID had a recommended minimum length of 112
> bits? Note doing so is compatible with the current RFC wording as is,
> without needing a new version and a new salt value.

While you can ask people to make a value longer than 112 bits, the RFC only requires 64 bits, so those that are not updated might not meet your expectations.  So you can ask, but you will likely never cause every deployed implementation to choose 14 byte connection IDs to make your NIST FIPS requirements happy.

To be clear, this is a use of the algorithms that does not need FIPS certification.  We send the keys along with the ciphertext.  Though we can't expect every FIPS audit to appreciate this not-so-fine point, the point will remain.

> Has it been considered to upgrade this to AEAD_AES_256_GCM by default?

No.  For the same reason as above, this would not interoperate with existing clients.

