IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 26 August 2019 22:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DC012008A for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=gWPVpIQ1; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=AXvcEimt
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GACjVOvTfWbK for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC0301201EA for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2836B5; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:49:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:49:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=o Q/oJJekrluY7a/Em8eixbxYviwtRTnyJarQAnSJk7U=; b=gWPVpIQ1nJEEuFBJz 0O+FgE8gxY9csNudWUwsHNIg9iqf5TS/2gg5TkWvkHyE8ylqh0dY4jZ4F6IFjnly 8jvgiIPkB7cbYg3CdL3DLn3Ep+ZeeJbO+52TY0ttoPjJtf96BgJdcyCYLrEJpiri NukQb1JVk+tjj0KZuctI27fmhzlR1PXHqupGYtI7LRZ6yVy7qGbO74K0hPtxlP84 xOP1dOB6Xs1DL0XJjRQXnNbvEYNmMPS4xoo2+68hQg5yVITMRTbuFfrkl2oQ7pRc OcRFt6nNO+9sv0wzEbD3aOJUCQ2FosEEe+jY0cYWbSn3TjxeI/NMZx9sA9AAbnWk sCg8w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=oQ/oJJekrluY7a/Em8eixbxYviwtRTnyJarQAnSJk 7U=; b=AXvcEimtOEXnpCZTGEVVolOg/uIiKHNCWa8T999deyFGKNt8Ff+YlLyEx miNoO+tE1W8MGeCmiN6Tmw9pg/7oMW36Ax9BDIkOXAkDf0gcuejGf/gVo7uthhFs 3AKQWnGapkzWc4j8qjcKO5G31NjpO6AFcf3dWmGJQ52Qq0Kou7Bf0EpJ3VxvFIb0 nH8H6gxVTqAgXCRfH4UO5IyCkubWswZgeF3B3a7zp/mQWL+ttv/qNyjE07fSpsPP OgIHsbAi+NZmsFHuRMOByzi48N35f0we5bbPYBhS0uLmUQ4dtLZoDMJRZxlRKjAu L+P59RiZg3F9puGPl39uTTwNvZHJA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:42FkXcBXgRjG7NNjl_TvLLBqtwkyd61wa2S3EsiE1nlI-4zWKThP0A>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudehhedgudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinh epfiefrdhorhhgpdhgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtpdhhthhtphefrdhi thenucfkphepudeggedrudefiedrudejhedrvdeknecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:42FkXQnjmTWrtIWLP1qHFpnaHq-iFsBtZZYzDQIqDQxm-R8sdLxbVg> <xmx:42FkXZoIN6LMLPUqmytRsPsuEeYTSkYpXsj96E9o-WH8a2HKMI3Gzg> <xmx:42FkXdfwyQJ7iSb1GvqbegWAP-QkKjPxJ0xgOSxuuon5FDu4kS1nMw> <xmx:5GFkXWIQMGeHspH1Xi31lUYH7XXQ1Kui7CDTDC4mwUeLjSIHaEZDgg>
Received: from macbook-pro.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0B0F9D60057; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:49:05 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E8935DC-6FB5-40F8-A843-1B3991D08CB9@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:49:01 +1000
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D6A9047D-13DB-4F96-8CFF-D6E1439A0FA1@mnot.net>
References: <5E8935DC-6FB5-40F8-A843-1B3991D08CB9@mnot.net>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/kVJPWldUdhE-4PDAuqTMYRBA-9U>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 22:49:13 -0000

After the discussion in the room and on the list, it appears we have consensus.

Cheers,


> On 16 Aug 2019, at 1:49 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> In Montreal, we had a discussion about priorities, where the outcome was that people in the room agreed to defer to the HTTP Working Group regarding whether HTTP/3 should ship with something compatible with HTTP/2 priorities in it:
>  https://github.com/quicwg/wg-materials/blob/master/ietf105/minutes.md#h3-priorities
> 
> Since then, the HTTP Working Group has come to consensus that it does not believe we should do so:
>  https://www.w3.org/mid/00CD4B65-7015-45F6-9F18-624B0DB7A501@mnot.net
> 
> This consensus call is to confirm this approach in this WG. In practical terms, it means we will remove the current HTTP/2-aligned priorities machinery from HTTP/3. It does NOT necessarily mean that HTTP/3 will ship without any form of priorities; just not this one. Doing so will resolve a number of outstanding issues, and make way for a replacement scheme, currently under discussion in a design team in the HTTP Working Group.
> 
> Please respond by the middle of next week; we'd like to move forward with this resolution.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email