Re: Consensus on Deploying QUIC v1 with HTTP/3

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 06 May 2021 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64923A2852 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mYr9T0MGpwwY for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F573A2850 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2021 09:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id t2-20020a17090ae502b029015b0fbfbc50so3767275pjy.3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 09:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MNp1CMWj21yFMVdx3TTfmMp28KmssDbyv/pdDgrq/xg=; b=m/9JMaIvY8okRbLjzgHoSGRdGrQul6JSk1ADncLC93if8oJpt8XlGzoPXVBY0IPZiW LED20f8w54c6YBOyC2xYOsJNYFZCRxMGDfr5paFvgU7ZRaQ7099j3QC75/VKY3YdcP3j MjnP+jvsuFOeAhSqgEUubRDOXx2N017m3ZNF+HUG8jMHBU2UWn+wPWjESxCp2aDU0Hfl BhRfTtxTtBFjN79ZuiYd4Mpsg6oAjUT/1G9hJGQ4dVlrh+kh3lbMVaLfy4BS9FpI5X3Y 2jH0H27voNJ+PFcYRj9ass9fChXSqiGQKs/4b889Vwo6zM27T4bzULoqu3kuQBeAF5vF tKlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MNp1CMWj21yFMVdx3TTfmMp28KmssDbyv/pdDgrq/xg=; b=K+lT9ONfo3pXzNUobKSLK99LjzSqWvrj+5nFWDVLkhQrU3MGZU4R3yuoPMa7ciBMh/ Mi5IGd+Y0IvgT7tou/NLCWs7J3Z/wPyqmMjphlxVVvgY7beIaaw/s4AuvXjtlwE+quzT WmGB2BD6lRP0ielAxqv07xBwRb+yPkou1LRbpuj8GSU1JQvcrTEyIIbMbEdHeEFX2fcv g+LJWJLWJOtumeM3mOZzu8h+EMr/SdTE2KJUZi60dv5uRrseh/e4oo8SR7HTSAW1XDxZ Ui8VL1D3gjv0H5IXiqJD8lfJKIsGxF/w+JXfEO9kRgcUw8FJ8zgst02xcWOiK+y7AMti GtjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NrjWd0rkp3BW2iaxnmswAhcmMrr/MK9BnAuTT0sIZvJODZJdM +mbomqyPtLLsjYZye7NhO6f8LiBbp6cH1hI23/c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZV6ehTWC7YuvXadB5tGO9wfwfs5bpV/mn9mybZTHH5c/QZCt5Q+zviYSORmFTeN6UQwAjb9y6yjTZuZFLXrg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c244:b029:ed:4d5a:cdaf with SMTP id 4-20020a170902c244b02900ed4d5acdafmr5279993plg.5.1620319108250; Thu, 06 May 2021 09:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9obE-Dbm5Rwmr=h_34vaps1pcv36Jg0MTS_o0mZHEF1FvA@mail.gmail.com> <6740dcaa-3c43-faf2-826e-1cb3bb113aff@gmx.de> <CADdTf+gKZwcZD12he2YaGpWpOePZp_EB4J0QoXL6ozfx0BgJDg@mail.gmail.com> <CADdTf+h=iEjJ6k6FmDBOhYY7iLTjyDPWBejdU+ocyUCiGA09yQ@mail.gmail.com> <6b0ce1c8-bbe4-f8cd-b9c9-8e2eb378bd6d@gmx.de> <CALGR9oag_Q-yj2jVvqrKfswAJn4FiNQ_A4H20_dHxmrrCPV80A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oag_Q-yj2jVvqrKfswAJn4FiNQ_A4H20_dHxmrrCPV80A@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 09:38:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+5Ce2NgnUFtHHO0FoEue7t9zph1HZQRe3_Yf3yzncAD9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus on Deploying QUIC v1 with HTTP/3
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dec07905c1abf0c8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/kiNMDuxEd8DusGscaA_8sNdjL3g>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 16:38:31 -0000

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:54 AM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This email commences a formal consensus call for permitting the deployment
> of QUIC "0x00000001" with HTTP/3 ALPN identifier "h3" *after*
> -invariants, -transport, -tls, and -recovery have been published as RFCs
> but *before *-http and -qpack are published as RFC. The call will end on
> May 13.
>

Hi Lucas, since this is a formal consensus call, can you formally define
what you meant by "deployment"? Some clarifying questions:
- Is running a 1% experiment on clients before then OK?
- Is running a 1% experiment on servers before then OK?
- Is running 0x00000001+h3 on your main production server today OK if you
don't use Alt-Svc?
What we're describing is effectively a flag day, and it would be good to
define its parameters clearly.

Thanks,
David