Re: Murray Kucherawy's Yes on draft-ietf-quic-transport-33: (with COMMENT)

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

> Lastly, also on 22.1.4: I believe (though my colleagues can correct me if I'm
> wrong) that the IESG's current preference is to list the IESG, and not a
> working group, as the contact email address for registrations over which the
> IETF has change control.

What we actually decided is this:
- Change control should be with "IETF".
- The contact address can be a working group mailing list, a mailing
list specifically set up for the purpose, or the IESG list.
- IANA will record the contact address, then the RFC Editor will
remove it from the published RFC.  That way, the address is not
recorded in an unchangeable place, but it with IANA, where it can be
changed if necessary (if the working group mailing list is closed, or
a new working group becomes a more appropriate place for discussion
later).

So what's there is actually OK, but the address of the QUIC working
group will not appear in the RFC.

Barry