Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn-00.txt

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Tue, 27 August 2024 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1834C151989; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3CLyv96VqIvi; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa31.google.com (mail-vk1-xa31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E401FC151543; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa31.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4fee7fa19c8so70102e0c.0; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724784023; x=1725388823; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ze29GmPjOmtYKSOPOWWYZ4j8xnwBsc9IytondJZ4UYU=; b=JvIfxe0wgPUM8Ig6XeFWeHWi9Y088VwlcKZ1aHpY/oEdgqqsHDQzSos1cemOPBnzrF CUTOOogARKc3H10x0qSTqeHUwL1LFZ9Xli9AiD56FbEpjF4NclQDMFankQ4ivQvTOwRz zKnAlHHryL7xQr8WC9Yp+a4nJNUxnAZPJVshe9mbq2buphHuwAy73H86Nxrn/BK4qQsu heEHefL36aFdjszTA2+HWYePHBYrjtKozxRU4zqF28cV8hrd71tCK94XLZiZpyu9ZjMK 3z2i9Vm+pDh2Sh+6MnLLo6OQ0t4H0vccdO9nh7t9jSSR2AanKeRHr6B07XAQQ2DTnj6m 7bRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724784023; x=1725388823; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ze29GmPjOmtYKSOPOWWYZ4j8xnwBsc9IytondJZ4UYU=; b=oQhvc+JWSZ93xmeLWZa+Oentb0L7TCxwo8pcmGdHOQgvVyNUST5ROGbItnAmEIwUhn S4+W6fnTaHPCrqoPUcnt+whUNi/VNRukVGjiH8rCK3Q6QU+EPWSRtLDR/wxIla5igddM ofAQH0ie/lS4mgWrngD/uyAA4CPphB2t6eJiMDfGASbw80elRvBXIoVvlin/k3BVqzoW 8V/K3NXNcp0MNijofWOLtMo77yA1kTIr+JsxGPCOzNIaT4NVHXOUy3MtzkEzPjZxEtjY 1tkjvXPi17uU6SXb9gK0bILzPCzY1JE56sdHfn/0Z7l21vKTpbkox9Sj5fOXA2rK5nyi FH5Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV0seCUGUc1d6mEQhpHk7yYAH7GBV96fa15oHnZxc3/uiqHrISbE50TdhpjedAmzedCGcZ4@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwtxEK2iHgPBFywrgSmCi2TmZ+69UZheiZzjKsllvyfs2iBdxvY K50JnnVBY5EMIc/9sMtF4EDDsM9MsVL8/MkCMWm3DWHltamwU7CEufyJR/7e7JbmdvFTBcl2Rvm n/KfBo8sNUrchie6VB2ReQVqAUZL8QdLm
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHBGbLygknfGiS/mGg06MpgWOB27Ed72WXcQHAhxZ8+qYj4lYsW/y0hKGG0g26d4vZIFpxLUdguU9lofJfOMGc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:2212:b0:4fc:da8f:c8a8 with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4fed5d66cadmr4896420e0c.1.1724784022542; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <172444161279.128198.6556076320862990924@dt-datatracker-584cd6c8dd-fvr2f> <CAM4esxRNbWKq3X-0HQmasDhozP5WR1AcJnczdLTgKbrMF4XXAA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxRNbWKq3X-0HQmasDhozP5WR1AcJnczdLTgKbrMF4XXAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:40:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTF5BvXM0Z2M2oioPUzwtOBMrg7SprvVZyfZBVnTWbaxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn-00.txt
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa61400620ae9281"
Message-ID-Hash: SX5ILGPMXMA7T5XH4DB2NOFQL5D72CAH
X-Message-ID-Hash: SX5ILGPMXMA7T5XH4DB2NOFQL5D72CAH
X-MailFrom: martin.h.duke@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-quic.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/lV6hi4TptXecpR2b61WV2gmQr7g>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:quic-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:quic-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:quic-leave@ietf.org>

Thanks to everyone who has sent comments, issues, and PRs.

The workflow on the original repo was hopelessly broken, so I deleted the
whole repo and started over:

https://github.com/martinduke/udp-ecn

The only open issue has been transferred.

If you have any PRs in progress, please migrate them.

On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 12:39 PM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi TSVWG and QUIC,
>
> I've made it some of the way through implementing receive ECN for
> Chromium, which involved quite a bit of trial and error in figuring out the
> quirks of the Apple and Windows UDP socket APIs.
>
> This is an informational draft that tries to capture some of that
> learning, since hopefully more QUIC implementations will add ECN support
> across multiple platforms.
>
> Obviously, this is a work in progress. People that have worked with other
> OSes, or that can see into the kernel code and update/correct/refute some
> of my statements here, are welcome to contribute.
>
> My guess is that it fits into TSVWG, although it is mostly of relevance to
> QUIC folks. If people are really interested in it, we could adopt it TSVWG.
> If not, at least there's a record somewhere so that others don't have to
> suffer as I did.
>
> Martin
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Date: Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 12:33 PM
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn-00.txt
> To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
>
>
> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn-00.txt has been
> successfully submitted by Martin Duke and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:     draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn
> Revision: 00
> Title:    Configuring UDP Sockets for ECN for Common Platforms
> Date:     2024-08-23
> Group:    Individual Submission
> Pages:    9
> URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn-00.txt
> Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn/
> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn
>
>
> Abstract:
>
>    Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) applies to all transport
>    protocols in principle.  However, it had limited applications for UDP
>    until QUIC became widely deployed.  As a result, documentation of UDP
>    socket APIs for ECN on various platforms is sparse.  This document
>    records the results of experimenting with these APIs in order to get
>    ECN working on UDP for Chromium on Apple, Linux, and Windows
>    platforms.
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>