Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 07 February 2021 07:36 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610E13AFA38 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 23:36:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=G/HkDGNL; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=rBl4E8kC
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cSWSXI7bxGL4 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 23:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFC3A3AFA35 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 23:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BFCB2C for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 02:36:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 07 Feb 2021 02:36:32 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=Hnr+XZHaB21Xnwc9d75wBSxbkMJd8T5MF7LLywmUBzU=; b=G/HkDGNL CwjrsdFbSVezaY/Aib1b0ObYSVm17GEzXPFUaFSVmSgAozZgryM3dzy/Y2Ttf7N9 5eK0f7Aw/hZ48Ehoyo+leGjKhXcFjgwhdT1jDCVIOMjjc7DwKEeIMh3D1pdwXU/a hyHJq4ahw6+zhxtoJE8xOD4xN7jGNwAaPbIo72CLf49NbghFA7qEHMv8caaIUl9f 6zem0k2yslTTuXursROIJdkmsaYyq1xJspd9k51veKUAdgQIvlT5hkT/Y0lkTNMe +yFJIdZS+T9Bz0aJIhejxMaxKYCuNkQ168PEn4ji/lfOBgT/J0hUjMZPIe34Z3h7 LSENLhLdMkD2mg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Hnr+XZHaB21Xnwc9d75wBSxbkMJd8 T5MF7LLywmUBzU=; b=rBl4E8kCs4Sn1jSpfmkaXR+nTlBBDD2oX+Vy31QVolz7y R89xZPVMKU+btYdc6gvxnPDEvyzjlmbLlHO1nUTIEllF7DLShvGtlpVlBMPaXSOK 7p01Rw4M0PV1rhif+x1OwF9za+S6qb7OyzYkKXnfQB2vzjZ3vKTxrhXj4E3c2onX 0U7Izl/muKOP72mQ48cSBzQFL3raTGd60nB7YlAX4yO0z9uzY7qVrRd8PGOikxdk oIst/upVARqhCbIjGT/tKlP6Yvs+nPuq8ZqA+NZMG3HN/a5qVn08g0Q4SylLJulc bbdnaHETc8yzF60PFlRRnyuzfEZx0a8jUblgHybQA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:f5gfYO0NbQCm_aW_XYCfiaRdnxz5yylgaYQkbz5Nu2vt9l69o0degQ> <xme:f5gfYBH4Y82wE50yZtgbmfYnLPLNNkpCryOeHskw89oeTVKtYyWJprlUtpf-9m47K 7BTyQaPTvxvRCa1fw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrhedtgddukecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenuc fhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuueho thcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrh hnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteen ucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeegtddrieehrddvtdefrddvfe ehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepugho pghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:f5gfYG49fKmqwVH23rFdU_J-h3N2Uc--lpG98VGs71vHavp45O1Sfw> <xmx:f5gfYP1nYhM0ufJmxDAXil7Pmcg711iX0QDKG_yB1Zy-bYRntDuwhw> <xmx:f5gfYBFZ0ylxRdMkcmSVn3LWr7vFJ82wFrHpDAywhqTYzMCilAKrUw> <xmx:gJgfYPOVLeSgFuNOnvCpHoagqlZiTP3x8LD6p44LeTzXGyDsWFg8LQ>
Received: from fv-az59-276.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [40.65.203.235]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1C0CD1080057 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 02:36:31 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1222993419981636978=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20210207073631.1C0CD1080057@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 02:36:31 -0500
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/n2z0NJCpTIJ8_Bp36N9JMilpElc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:36:38 -0000
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+0/-13/💬18)
12 issues received 18 new comments:
- #4803 Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 4 (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4803 [-qpack] [iesg] [proposal-ready]
- #4802 Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 3 (6 by MikeBishop, afrind, larseggert, rgwilton)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4802 [-qpack] [iesg]
- #4779 Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Comment 4 (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779 [-http] [design] [iesg] [proposal-ready]
- #4536 Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 13 (2 by LPardue, gloinul)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4536 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- #4527 Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 4 (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4527 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- #4525 Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 2 (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4525 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- #4485 Ben Kaduk's TLS Comment 9 (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4485 [-tls] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- #4475 Ben Kaduk's TLS Discuss 1 (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4475 [-tls] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- #4453 Martin Duke Transport Comment 2 (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4453 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- #4378 IANA review of -transport; question 3 (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [ietf-lc]
- #4369 IANA review of -tls (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4369 [-tls] [call-issued] [design] [ietf-lc]
- #4280 No IANA version registry (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4280 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [ietf-lc]
13 issues closed:
- Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 13 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4536 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 4 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4527 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 2 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4525 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- Ben Kaduk's TLS Comment 9 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4485 [-tls] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- Ben Kaduk's TLS Discuss 1 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4475 [-tls] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- Martin Duke Transport Comment 2 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4453 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [iesg]
- IANA review of -transport; question 3 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [ietf-lc]
- IANA review of -tls https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4369 [-tls] [call-issued] [design] [ietf-lc]
- No IANA version registry https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4280 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [ietf-lc]
- Ben Kaduk's QPACK Comment 6 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4796 [-qpack] [iesg] [proposal-ready]
- Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 4 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4803 [-qpack] [iesg] [proposal-ready]
- Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 3 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4802 [-qpack] [design] [iesg]
- Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Comment 4 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779 [-http] [design] [iesg] [proposal-ready]
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+33/-0/💬13)
33 issues created:
- App/Ops: Server deployments with load balancers (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/206
- App: Many and various editorial NiTS (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/205
- App: Ref: Transport BEHAVE Specs (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/204
- App: Ref: TAPS API work: on TCP fallback / API? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/203
- App: Ref: Sect 1: Cite RFC8055 here? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/202
- App: Sec 14: Security Considerations reference to transport BCP? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/201
- App: Use (and do not need to use) of ICMP (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/200
- App: Section 12 on Versioning (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/199
- App: Ref: Should the text ion DSCP also cite RFC7657? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/198
- What does "prime" need? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/197
- App: ... interference by network elements such as firewalls (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/196
- App: Port Usage uses RFC2119 word? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/195
- Padding explanation needs to mention DPLPMTUD (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/194
- Sect 4.3. Flow Control - we should have a subsection also encouraging timely credits (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/193
- App: End of Sect 2: RFC2119 Keyword? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/192
- manageability: ID Nits: unused references (by seanturner)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/191
- manageability: ID Nits: duplicate reference (by seanturner)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/190
- manageability: ID Nits: 2119 Terminology (by seanturner)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/189
- applicability: ID Nits: 2119 Terminology (by seanturner)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/188
- applicability: ID Nits: duplicate reference (by seanturner)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/187
- applicability: ID Nits: unused reference (by seanturner)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/186
- This issue contains a set of editorial NiTs from QUIC Manageability-09 (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/185
- Sect 4.8: Reducing the timeout on UDP NATs (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/184
- Sect 4.1 : what is the recommendation for middleboxes/NATs? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/183
- Sect 4.6: emphatically NOT RECOMMENDED use of ACK mitigation? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/182
- Sect 4.7: Also nMF-Classifier for QoS? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/181
- Sect 3.7.2 on spinning to understand the RTT (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/180
- Sect 3.7.2 : Is the spinning of bits invariant or for the current QUIC Spec? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/179
- Sect 2.7: Telling middleboxes to ignore version? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/178
- Sect 2.4: MTU or Min QUIC Packet Size? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/177
- Section 2.3 - QUIC Port Numbers (not really different to other ports) (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/176
- Discuss application-layer graceful/scheduled close (by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/175
- Does TCP fallback require TLS 1.3 (by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/174
7 issues received 13 new comments:
- #202 App: Ref: Sect 1: Cite RFC8055 here? (1 by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/202
- #195 App: Port Usage uses RFC2119 word? (1 by seanturner)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/195
- #192 App: End of Sect 2: RFC2119 Keyword? (1 by seanturner)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/192
- #188 applicability: ID Nits: 2119 Terminology (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/188
- #185 This issue contains a set of editorial NiTs from QUIC Manageability-09 (2 by gorryfair, larseggert)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/185
- #175 Discuss application-layer graceful/scheduled close (2 by LPardue, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/175
- #174 Does TCP fallback require TLS 1.3? (5 by LPardue, ianswett, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/174
* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-4/💬2)
1 issues created:
- Replace configuration pseudocode with YANG (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/91
2 issues received 2 new comments:
- #91 Replace configuration pseudocode with YANG (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/91
- #88 Extend low-config concept to all algorithms (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/88
4 issues closed:
- Replace configuration pseudocode with YANG https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/91
- Extend low-config concept to all algorithms https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/88
- Low-Config CID creating huge problems with coexistence of configurations https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/84
- Bytes for server use https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/85
* quicwg/version-negotiation (+0/-3/💬0)
3 issues closed:
- Client's version preference is ignored https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/14
- Is the server required to upgrade versions? https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/13
- The client is unable to detect downgrade attacks https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/5
Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+2/-3/💬4)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Update Contributing.md to reflect post-IESG world (by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4824
- Implementations have limits (by MikeBishop)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4823 [-qpack]
3 pull requests received 4 new comments:
- #4823 Implementations have limits (1 by larseggert)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4823 [-qpack]
- #4820 Tidy up reference style (2 by mnot, seanturner)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4820
- #4808 Rework HTTP authority/coalescing again (1 by rdanyliw)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808 [-http] [design] [iesg]
3 pull requests merged:
- QPACK pseudocode updates from IESG feedback
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4817
- Tidy up reference style
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4820
- Implementations have limits
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4823 [-qpack] [design]
* quicwg/load-balancers (+4/-4/💬1)
4 pull requests submitted:
- Ian's Editorial Nits (by ianswett)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/95
- shortened references (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/94
- sync yang with master (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/93
- Sync all-lowconfig with master (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/92
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #90 YANG Model (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/90
4 pull requests merged:
- YANG Model
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/90
- Sync all-lowconfig with master
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/92
- Generalize SID Allocation
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/89
- Clean up server-use bytes
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/86
* quicwg/version-negotiation (+0/-1/💬2)
1 pull requests received 2 new comments:
- #11 Major rewrite of draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation (2 by DavidSchinazi, ekr)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/11
1 pull requests merged:
- Major rewrite of draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/11
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
- Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot