IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus call for adding support for non-ack eliciting DATAGRAMs

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Wed, 08 September 2021 12:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02203A269A for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 05:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=b438V1My; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=an8Hlsjs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z0lsEazu-h8g for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 05:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA3023A269C for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 05:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C4232009A6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 08:22:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:22:12 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=9gi47t3+91fH9I+7DAW0JlLVfP2ZqZa phB2yP3/r1sM=; b=b438V1MyVSSIcC5/POuhxP4r5ylNoZoiQJF9HXa/0vs+kxh GlXFYQ2N8rQlCRNaHJlO2+W561rU4ESsRLPambSPYF50pfCtlQqDs22Vl4vSN48X a3pmvnNT619i9znSoHY2yjQ5jHMDFEOMT7sKytnZzshp1cfn7kxPOkAIZBJLJaHH xQIy8j4y20U4NKMBrUl3L6e6rYlqKJ4yazyf/gx0E00bynC4qWG5cm4GCbumyuPb YKZXnaDwpF++xydJzp9xvYqP+PMBLV3XoMcDZuCvPjb9cskJ1W38FXyLD3dw7m8V leOkLpm3QBu5/+ZuS68Ixe4FZ6KbTE2cJGYEExw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=9gi47t 3+91fH9I+7DAW0JlLVfP2ZqZaphB2yP3/r1sM=; b=an8HlsjsLLxSyHsA0Nua2+ AIU1Gz9xN8vgAxGfBrfOoDtPCS0gpIaRcBKfwo9zD+7zU1kBiG4rU40i/0l8+bQS IzXGAPN1Ky6IZau1U8gn7uZJjFj2WESpjpxqgrTcjqyw+0AipCpATfJdLIr9qNUj elTakuEQwxnGrDnUbHO/3mlztGbUhar01jFrar0oCqg0jAyDD1eB2br6fHRvGVY1 oicin/Srnn16JEn30DYXHp+dHnaciFfg1zF4Icu0JzvU7OocGbEOEgMp4tyi/1rm jhfOD/+Zpq9799tpLYOsPcef/ktuHM7GdnUS5IyqygHFduX5ikomItW1u9t4OIsA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:86o4YSSM9Y4UCPDegR8Hdq5nRXMjc2O3nCD7iRPviLbDD2Cv6sKmxA> <xme:86o4YXwfmytG1fw6gHhvCIgIUm3DRi2MtXcLubjMUFemVlZxKfEQ_TBSPZwyh7iRQ ac3BybgY9m3sIDYTOk>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudefjedghedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtgefhkeegfffhteefje ekveefteehheelgeehheevleefteefieekfefgjedvgeenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhh uhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:86o4Yf0nBnWArvyDSu0RD4ZbpSP_Ju51mhGkqo2NYriLLVmvj88OBw> <xmx:86o4YeDAq-MsFn2NcORVwQenPULqO6ANktTkURz573wKFwPKYyc-DA> <xmx:86o4YbgjLopVmEseBPP6uIGfHwK4k6Mc0KhBUG1AFBZoptOgVp92zw> <xmx:86o4YWvXNRlvX0X-dV4G06FHQaPEp_wy5cC6HxoBTPotW1BJj_bR7g>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7939C3C0EB6; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 08:22:11 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1229-g7ca81dfce5-fm-20210908.005-g7ca81dfc
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <16d22e18-a169-418c-89af-0355a241fbf0@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9obraBc=LHs6625SnXPZZ=jy170a4dYACwLxaARkoY0_YA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALGR9obraBc=LHs6625SnXPZZ=jy170a4dYACwLxaARkoY0_YA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 22:21:51 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Consensus call for adding support for non-ack eliciting DATAGRAMs
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/nIlajviiwi4EVlKqK0BPzy5SpCg>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:22:22 -0000

No change is good.  It's nothing we can't fix trivially later if we find that was the wrong outcome.  And getting this right, even if it were needed, would be tricky. It's also not all that useful when you consider that ack frequency exists as a way to manage the cost and overhead of acknowledgments.

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, at 21:31, Lucas Pardue wrote:
> Hello QUIC WG,
> 
> This is a consensus call for datagram issue #42 [1] - Allow a Sender to 
> Control Datagram ACKs. The proposed resolution is to close this issue 
> with no action.
> 
> If you object to the proposal, please do so on the issue or in response 
> to this message. 
> 
> The call will run for one week, closing at end of day on September 15 
> 2021, anywhere on earth.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/42

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email